Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

BA787 Smoking at LHR

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

BA787 Smoking at LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Nov 2016, 12:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA787 Smoking at LHR

There are press reports that fire engines were called to a parked BA 787 this morning, following reports of a smell of burning.
The aircraft was apparently undergoing maintenance at the time.
Photo here: Heathrow Airport fire: reports of burning on British Airways plane | London Evening Standard
KelvinD is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2016, 17:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lakeside
Posts: 534
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smell?

The group seems to be congregating around the belly dump tube for the battery enclosure in the EEbay?
Concours77 is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2016, 19:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what`s the news, just another self-combusting dreamliner. Concours77 says batteries are on ebay and lots of people gathering around somebody`s belly tube. Not a pleasant sight I`d have thought.
Chronus is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2016, 22:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronus
just another self-combusting dreamliner.
Boeing seem to have messed these aircraft up in so many ways. Having just travelled in them twice in the "pointy end" I was very disappointed in the noise levels.

An A380 in the last row economy is much quieter that these things.

Almost every other day we hear about another engine shutdown in them.

And what now? Battery issues again??
p.j.m is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2016, 22:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mosquitoville
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's ironic you mention messed Boeing up and then compare it to the A380 when one design has several years worths of back orders and the other's future is uncertain due lack of orders...
Sorry Dog is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 08:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"... if the battery has cooked off the containment has presumably done it's job"

ok, but there should be a health warning sticker placed so the pax in seat 3?? knows they're sitting in a potentially very hot seat.
oldchina is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 08:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently this was a false alarm. There was a smell on board and fire service was dispatched as a precaution. But they didn't find anything and left after 30 minutes.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 08:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Judging from that ES/Instagram photo, the aircraft in question looks to have been B789 G-ZBKG on Stand 552, which had arrived from AUH 4 hours previously.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 10:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 400
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The group seems to be congregating around the belly dump tube for the battery enclosure in the EEbay?
I'm sure all you guys know, but I don't: can someone tell me what a belly dump tube is (sounds like something you need after visiting certain restaurants) and why a battery enclosure has one?
OldLurker is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 10:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the pilot, I mean aircraft, goes to the wrong sort of restaurant, I mean battery manufacturer, and ends up with a flaming chili vindaloo ache in his guts, I mean thermal runaway in the battery compartment, they both want some easy way to get rid of the toxic material

Airplane detail here: http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/com...procedures.pdf

Pilot advice can be found in many places, I recommend a lassi and choosing a better restaurant next time
nicolai is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 11:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 400
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks!
OldLurker is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 12:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,197
Received 393 Likes on 244 Posts
Originally Posted by peekay4
Apparently this was a false alarm. There was a smell on board and fire service was dispatched as a precaution. But they didn't find anything and left after 30 minutes.
That did not stop the usual suspects from launching their usual attacks and trying to start an A versus B scrum yet again.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2016, 13:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lakeside
Posts: 534
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
".....That did not stop the usual suspects from launching their usual attacks and trying to start an A versus B scrum..."

Not my intention.

Thanks to Nicolai for the link, Boeing seem to have made the original problem quite manageable....
Concours77 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2016, 18:31
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Lakeside
Posts: 534
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone inform if Yuasa is still building a square (in section) battery from a continuous roll of separator, electrolyte, etc.? I thought at the time molding a cylinder into a square stack introduced mechanical stresses and increased the occurrence of hot spots?
Concours77 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2016, 19:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hi Nicolai
3.
Evacuate area around exterior of the airplane upwind to at least 18m/
60 ft. from airplane
Do they really mean downwind or,what?
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2016, 20:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would prefer to be upwind of the toxic fumes than downwind, but each to their own.
Cirrussy is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2016, 21:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed that apparent inconsistency too, but perhaps they mean "move everyone around the airplane to upwind and at least 18m away".

Similar to how one might say "The building was evacuated to the car park" - meaning everyone in the building moved to the car park.
nicolai is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2016, 09:28
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nicolai
I guess they do actually mean "evacuate everyone to a position upwind at least 18m from the aeroplane" but, that is only part of the issue. What about the adjacent jet that is downwind and boarding pax from busses etc in a possible scenario? The toxic gases are extremely nasty. what is the safety recommendation for evacuating downwind of a battery event? BTW, anyone within the safety distance must wear positive pressure breathing equipment so, all those guys staring at the "event" are in the wrong place!
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2016, 18:47
  #19 (permalink)  

Plastic PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 1,898
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't all this precautionary stainless-steel enclosure and associated whatnots rather negate the advantages of these batteries?

Just asking....
Mac the Knife is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2016, 22:08
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Eastern Anglia
Age: 75
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was wondering that, the battery issues were after my time but I guess weight-wise it could be the case although perhaps in energy per unit volume they still win? As you can see in the pictures included in the Boeing fire-fighting document a few posts up, space is very, very tight, especially around the Aft EEbay battery, so more conventional battery technology was not going to fit without massive re-working.

That looks like a picture in an early airplane - ZA001 or 2 at a guess and it was tight even before the bullet-proof plate got added! 'my' bit of kit was the monster cardframe to the left of the battery and if you look closely you can probably still see bits of my skin from the happy months I spent pulling the darn thing in and out back in the day - and that was before the battery put on weight!
fenland787 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.