Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

777W ride in turbulence

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

777W ride in turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th October 2016 | 15:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 6
From: Here
777W ride in turbulence

Hi folks, just recently paxed (in the aft) of various 777W flights with different carriers/aircraft ages, and surprised how you seem to feel every single bump, no matter how light or moderate, the whole thing just jolts. I read about the turbulence suppression system, but it doesn't seem to be doing that good of a job. The A320 family that I fly also can feel harsh but it seems to do a better job in comparison....

Any 777 drivers have any idea whats going on??
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 15:33
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,738
Likes: 2,119
From: Reading, UK
Don't mean to state the obvious, but the back end of a 777 is farther from the CofG than the back end of an A320.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 15:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 6
From: Here
True, but doesn't explain why the thing just unquestionably rocks from side to side at the slightest bump compared with other (Airbus + Boeing) long haul aircraft of the same size.
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 16:13
  #4 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 280
Likes: 22
From: The wrong timezone
I always thought it was a bit poor in turbulence too - not enough speed stability.
anson harris is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 21:37
  #5 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 101
From: Róisín Dubh
Well it's moving a hell of a lot faster than the A320 for one thing....
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 21:53
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,738
Likes: 2,119
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Una Due Tfc
Well it's moving a hell of a lot faster than the A320 for one thing....
About 8% faster in cruise, in fact.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 21:56
  #7 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 101
From: Róisín Dubh
M085 vs M078 makes a big difference in turbulence....at least I assume it does with all the whining you hear coming off the NAT
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2016 | 22:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
the lateral oscillation due to the gust suppression system has been talked about quite a bit.
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2016 | 07:27
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 83
Likes: 1
From: home @ 103E
I sit at the pointy end, flying both the 63m & 73m long variants. I tend to spill more coffee on the longer ones. 😯
perantau is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2016 | 07:38
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 845
From: Tring, UK
Easy. Pay a bit more and travel nearer the middle.

I have noticed on the -300 that quite low amplitude lateral disturbances, nowhere near worth putting the seatbelt signs on for, are just the right frequency to “pump” oscillations in cups and glasses to the point that the liquid makes a determined bid for freedom. Quite annoying in the middle of the night when you’re not aware of it building up until you get drenched with cold tea...
FullWings is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2016 | 08:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: france
resonance

Good example of resonance in cups and glasses with the plane oscillation (Where is smiley "wet by cold tea"?)
roulishollandais is offline  
Reply
Old 8th October 2016 | 14:00
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 674
Likes: 10
From: Krug departure, Merlot transition
All I know is a few years after getting on the 747 I suddenly realised I never seemed to hit any turbulence any more...
main_dog is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 06:08
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 57
From: GPS L INVALID
It's true, the modal gust suppression leaves something to be desired in the -300 combined with what I guess is a slightly too large vertical stabiliser for the fuselage length, all turbulence seems to be translated into tail waggle
STBYRUD is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 07:23
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 86
From: Planet Earth
Too large ?


It always looked way too small to me, that's the problem.
stilton is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 17:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: US
777 has a much better wing in turbulence than the 320.
misd-agin is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 05:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Sat in the rear a couple times across the Pacific in the 777. Seems to be a nice, rubber like bouncing motion in turbulence. Found it relaxing and put me to sleep. Personally they should 'make it bounce' like that when it's smooth.


More concerned with flying so long over water with 'only' 2 engines. Bring back the 747 I say. Who cares if it costs a little more to fill up at the service station?
Jonno_aus is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 07:31
  #17 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,738
Likes: 2,119
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by Jonno_aus
Who cares if it costs a little more to fill up at the service station?
You mean, apart from the manufacturers, airlines and 99% of fare-paying passengers?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 14:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Australia
99% of passengers care if it costs a little more to run? Ok.
Jonno_aus is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 16:03
  #19 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 3,359
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Jonno_aus
99% of passengers care if it costs a little more to run? Ok.
They care when it gets reflected in the cost of their ticket
tdracer is online now  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 16:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Cut back the airline's CEOs and other managers salary and bonus? Easy!
Jonno_aus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.