Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

APP CLB GRAD & LDG CLB GRAD?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

APP CLB GRAD & LDG CLB GRAD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th October 2016 | 07:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: RAINBOW
APP CLB GRAD & LDG CLB GRAD?

Hello guys, just a question got stuck on my mind.

While applying approach, minimums may vary depending on Go-Around Climb gradient. In the company that I m flying, we calculate with the help of Electronic Flight Bag. There, after calculations; gives us 2 results; APP CLB GRAD & LDG CLB GRAD.

So according to which we have to select minimums/GA climb gradient?
And what are the differences ? I think I missed the logic so anyone could explain briefly?

Thanks in advance.
Manicured garden is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 09:00
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 9
From: FL510
Approach climb gradient.
That's gear up, approach flaps, single engine.
Landing climb gradient would be gear down, all engines, hence hardly ever limiting.
safelife is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 11:01
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 23
From: Seoul/Gold Coast.....
My dim memory tells me : Approach climb, one engine inoperative, gear retracted, intermediate flap setting, speed not above 1.5 x VS= 2.5% gradient.

: Landing climb, all engines operative, full flap, not above 1.3 x VS= 3.2% gradient.
zlin77 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2016 | 12:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 1
From: bkk
Yes but Mr Garden, what you are being referred to are the MINIMUM gradients, generally mandated by ICAO, however take a look at the case of VHHH runway 07L.There are two missed approach gradients, one is 7% because it starts at 222 feet the other much less around 3% because it starts at 1200 feet or so with no approach lights, the obvious reason being that the MA track flies over very high local terrain.07R on the other hand is much lower gradient as it goes over the sea, Peter.
piratepete is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 07:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: RAINBOW
zlin77 + safelife + piratepete thanks a lot guys! Now it's more clear!
Manicured garden is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 14:49
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Ok now we mentioning these performance issues I have a question as well. Lets say you need to use the higher minima because the lower minima is not giving you the required performance. What if we descent below minima and for whatever reason we have to go around. Is our obst clearance assured?
whitelabel is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 15:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 1
From: bkk
This is a good question and can only be answered either from your aircraft AFM charts otherwise your Runway Analysis service provider.Peter.
piratepete is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2016 | 15:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
In that case you would follow the engine out/bulked landing procedure.

Usually the min gradient is 2.5%, if you cannot make that then you cannot do the approach.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2016 | 08:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: VIE
Standard missed approaches require a minimum climb gradient of 2.5% if not otherwise indicated.
But airworthiness requirements for a twin engine aircraft only ask for 2.1% in CAT1 or Non precision conditions
(3 engines 2.4% and 4 engines 2.7%).
Only CAT 2/3 requires 2.5%. Therefore it makes sense to use the CAT 2 requirements for Landing Performance Calculations.
Balked Landings (Landing Climb) require no one engine out performance, only 3.2% climb gradient with all engines operative.
Therefore operators provide special balked landing procedures for performance critical airports i.e. INN.
HGVO is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2016 | 09:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Europe
In my outfit we use the efato procedure in case the ga clb gradient is below the required gradient.
hph304 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.