Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TCAS alt readout

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TCAS alt readout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 06:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
TCAS alt readout

Anyone aware of tables/formulas/algorithm, etc for figuring out the delay/lag between altitude observed on a TCAS from another aircraft to its actual altitude in a climb or descent?

Simply put, I see an aircraft on my TCAS at 10,000 but climbing/descending, is there a formula published for determining the difference in altitude between what it's at and what I'm seeing on my TCAS?

Before it's pointed out to me that has no practical application for in flight use, I recognize that. The question came up while killing time on a long flight.
West Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 06:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Internally, TCAS calculates the future position and if there is a conflict.
underfire is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 06:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Yup, but not what I'm looking for.
West Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 07:28
  #4 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Did not find it yet

but tried here:

http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...%2020-151A.pdf

maybe you will be more thorough.

FD.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 09:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,104
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Anyone aware of tables/formulas/algorithm, etc for figuring out the delay/lag between altitude observed on a TCAS from another aircraft to its actual altitude in a climb or descent?

Simply put, I see an aircraft on my TCAS at 10,000 but climbing/descending, is there a formula published for determining the difference in altitude between what it's at and what I'm seeing on my TCAS?

Before it's pointed out to me that has no practical application for in flight use, I recognize that. The question came up while killing time on a long flight.
If there was such a predictable formula then don't you think it would be utilised in the TCAS itself to give the most accurate information?
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 12:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Anyone aware of tables/formulas/algorithm, etc for figuring out the delay/lag between altitude observed on a TCAS from another aircraft to its actual altitude in a climb or descent?

Simply put, I see an aircraft on my TCAS at 10,000 but climbing/descending, is there a formula published for determining the difference in altitude between what it's at and what I'm seeing on my TCAS?

Before it's pointed out to me that has no practical application for in flight use, I recognize that. The question came up while killing time on a long flight.
Yes: Reported altitude + Climb rate X ( Transmitting Transponder system latency + Radio propagation delay + Receiving TCAS system latency)

That formula will give you the altitude of the other aircraft at any moment. The difficulty is determining the value of those variables.
A Squared is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 14:17
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by A Squared
Yes: Reported altitude + Climb rate X ( Transmitting Transponder system latency + Radio propagation delay + Receiving TCAS system latency)

That formula will give you the altitude of the other aircraft at any moment. The difficulty is determining the value of those variables.
Thanks, makes sense.
West Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 14:21
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
If there was such a predictable formula then don't you think it would be utilised in the TCAS itself to give the most accurate information?
If you don't know the answer, it's quite acceptable not to post anything.
West Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 14:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Squared View Post
Yes: Reported altitude + Climb rate X ( Transmitting Transponder system latency + Radio propagation delay + Receiving TCAS system latency)

That formula will give you the altitude of the other aircraft at any moment. The difficulty is determining the value of those variables.
Thanks, makes sense.
Transmitting Transponder system latency < 100 milliseconds (mainly the refresh rate of the altitude from the air data computer. The internal interrogation / reply processing of the Transponder will be small in comparison)

Radio propagation delay <1millisecond

Receiving TCAS system latency [the display works on a 1s refresh so that is the maximum latency]

So potentially the height data is maximum 1101milliseconds old.
At 5000ft per minute that's around 92ft as a maximum. But as an average probably much less.

This is simply for the display of course. The internal tracking algorithms of the TCAS unit are not constrained to the 1s refresh rate.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2016, 04:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I would wonder about that latency, given the latency in the GPS position.

Depending on the system, they handle they track and handle the threats differently, hence, there is a proprietary factor as well.
underfire is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2016, 09:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,104
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dont Hang Up
Transmitting Transponder system latency < 100 milliseconds (mainly the refresh rate of the altitude from the air data computer. The internal interrogation / reply processing of the Transponder will be small in comparison)

Radio propagation delay <1millisecond

Receiving TCAS system latency [the display works on a 1s refresh so that is the maximum latency]

So potentially the height data is maximum 1101milliseconds old.
At 5000ft per minute that's around 92ft as a maximum. But as an average probably much less.

This is simply for the display of course. The internal tracking algorithms of the TCAS unit are not constrained to the 1s refresh rate.
The climb rate is unknown to the flight crew other than that it is more than 500 fpm, so it is not possible to come up with a meaningful formula. You can use assumptions but as you say the result is probably much less than 100' which means that most of the time the difference between displayed altitude and actual altitude is less than the display precision.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2016, 11:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I would wonder about that latency, given the latency in the GPS position.
TCAS does not use GPS at all.

Altitude is barometric.
Range and range rate are calculated from interrogation pings.
Direction is highly approximate and for pilot situational awareness only.

Depending on the system, they handle they track and handle the threats differently, hence, there is a proprietary factor as well.
TCAS is a specific implementation of ACAS. TCAS algorithms are standardised with the intention that there should be no variation between manufacturers.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 02:30
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Anyone aware of tables/formulas/algorithm, etc for figuring out the delay/lag between altitude observed on a TCAS from another aircraft to its actual altitude in a climb or descent?
Where I come from, we call the formula PFM.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 21:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malvern, UK
Posts: 425
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JammedStab
Where I come from, we call the formula PFM.
Well that's very nice. But for those of us who don't know where you come from or what PFM stands for, we are no better informed.
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2016, 23:29
  #15 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I suppose Pretty, Fluffy, Meaningful it is not.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2016, 22:42
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the friendly folks at NASA...

TCAS-II resolution Advisory Detection Algorithm

DHU,
Sorry, I was thinking that it relied on Mode S for more than ID...
underfire is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.