Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Shuttle fuel burn

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Shuttle fuel burn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2016, 19:53
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Joema

A pleasure to read your posts... "Of course the ultimate goal is delivering a payload. On Apollo 15 the Saturn V delivered a payload of 140,930 kg (310,697 lbs) to low earth orbit. The heaviest shuttle payload was about 23,586 kg (52,000 lbs).

It would have taken six shuttle launches to deliver to LEO the same useful payload as a single Saturn V."

You are also correct to support LOX Rockets against air breathing space-plane lift to orbit, IMO. Cheers

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 21:30
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: D(Emona)
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 1 Post
Shuttle payload was 23 tons but the Shuttle itself was additional 80 tons.
Dufo is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 04:40
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NASA was constantly working on propulsion system mods to increase the payload capacity of the shuttle. Some were put into service and some were only ground tested.
- The super lightweight (Al-Li alloy) external tank saved about 7,000lbs and was needed to get some of the heavier ISS module payloads to the required orbit.
- There was a lightweight filament wound SRB case developed but never flown.
- There was a 5 segment SRB developed for the shuttle that would have increased max weight of ISS payloads by about 10 tons. The 5 segment SRB is being used on the new SLS vehicle.
- I recall reading that NASA was looking at super cooling the LOx to reduce volume and allow a smaller, lighter tank to be used.
- The shuttle used the payload assist module (PAM) to boost payloads into higher orbits.
riff_raff is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 05:09
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Cape Town, ZA
Age: 62
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_...enger_disaster
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
GordonR_Cape is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 14:35
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GordonR_Cape
"A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_...enger_disaster
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
I wrote much of the original article, although I no longer maintain it.

National Geographic Channel is showing a documentary this week, titled "Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes". It uses cinema verite techniques (no narrator, no new interviews, no commentary, no recreations) to factually explain the event using little-seen archival footage. Barbara Morgan (Christa McAuliffe's backup) described it as "very compelling and respectful".

Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes - National Geographic Channel

About Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes Show - National Geographic Channel - UK

Link to trailer: http://tinyurl.com/zgkc7cx

For anyone interested in deep technical and procedural aspects, by far the most detailed account of the disaster and history of the SRB program is "Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster", by Allan J. McDonald.

McDonald discusses what happened and implications for engineering ethics in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_I-WUQvbjM

While a different incident, the transcript of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) from 4-23-03 is very educational, in particular statements by Robert F. Thompson, the shuttle program manager from inception to first flight. It covers key shuttle development decisions, development costs, planned flight rate, etc (do right-click and save as): https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/PDFS/VOL6/H08.PDF If problems opening this, use top-level link and select "H.8 April 23,2003 Houston,Texas" : https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/html/VOL6.html
joema is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 15:46
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster
As an aside (i.e. thread drift) today is sadly the 49th Anniversary of the Apollo Fire.

http://history.nasa.gov/Apollo204/
wiggy is online now  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 16:43
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Old Lyme, Connecticut
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While a different incident, the transcript of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) from 4-23-03 is very educational, in particular statements by Robert F. Thompson, the shuttle program manager from inception to first flight. It covers key shuttle development decisions, development costs, planned flight rate, etc (do right-click and save as): https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/PDFS/VOL6/H08.PDF If problems opening this, use top-level link and select "H.8 April 23,2003 Houston,Texas" : https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/html/VOL6.html
Thank you very much for this, joema, it's fascinating. As it happens I just got through re-reading the main CAIB final report - one of the best-written and organised reports I've ever come across - but I had none of the later appendices (Appendices A, B, and C are included in the final report). You've provided me with some more good reading.
vaneyck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.