Shuttle fuel burn
Joema
A pleasure to read your posts... "Of course the ultimate goal is delivering a payload. On Apollo 15 the Saturn V delivered a payload of 140,930 kg (310,697 lbs) to low earth orbit. The heaviest shuttle payload was about 23,586 kg (52,000 lbs).
It would have taken six shuttle launches to deliver to LEO the same useful payload as a single Saturn V."
You are also correct to support LOX Rockets against air breathing space-plane lift to orbit, IMO. Cheers
OAP
A pleasure to read your posts... "Of course the ultimate goal is delivering a payload. On Apollo 15 the Saturn V delivered a payload of 140,930 kg (310,697 lbs) to low earth orbit. The heaviest shuttle payload was about 23,586 kg (52,000 lbs).
It would have taken six shuttle launches to deliver to LEO the same useful payload as a single Saturn V."
You are also correct to support LOX Rockets against air breathing space-plane lift to orbit, IMO. Cheers
OAP
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NASA was constantly working on propulsion system mods to increase the payload capacity of the shuttle. Some were put into service and some were only ground tested.
- The super lightweight (Al-Li alloy) external tank saved about 7,000lbs and was needed to get some of the heavier ISS module payloads to the required orbit.
- There was a lightweight filament wound SRB case developed but never flown.
- There was a 5 segment SRB developed for the shuttle that would have increased max weight of ISS payloads by about 10 tons. The 5 segment SRB is being used on the new SLS vehicle.
- I recall reading that NASA was looking at super cooling the LOx to reduce volume and allow a smaller, lighter tank to be used.
- The shuttle used the payload assist module (PAM) to boost payloads into higher orbits.
- The super lightweight (Al-Li alloy) external tank saved about 7,000lbs and was needed to get some of the heavier ISS module payloads to the required orbit.
- There was a lightweight filament wound SRB case developed but never flown.
- There was a 5 segment SRB developed for the shuttle that would have increased max weight of ISS payloads by about 10 tons. The 5 segment SRB is being used on the new SLS vehicle.
- I recall reading that NASA was looking at super cooling the LOx to reduce volume and allow a smaller, lighter tank to be used.
- The shuttle used the payload assist module (PAM) to boost payloads into higher orbits.
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Cape Town, ZA
Age: 62
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_...enger_disaster
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Nashville
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GordonR_Cape
"A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_...enger_disaster
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
Worth reading by anyone interested in the safety of complex technology.
National Geographic Channel is showing a documentary this week, titled "Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes". It uses cinema verite techniques (no narrator, no new interviews, no commentary, no recreations) to factually explain the event using little-seen archival footage. Barbara Morgan (Christa McAuliffe's backup) described it as "very compelling and respectful".
Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes - National Geographic Channel
About Challenger Disaster: Lost Tapes Show - National Geographic Channel - UK
Link to trailer: http://tinyurl.com/zgkc7cx
For anyone interested in deep technical and procedural aspects, by far the most detailed account of the disaster and history of the SRB program is "Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster", by Allan J. McDonald.
McDonald discusses what happened and implications for engineering ethics in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_I-WUQvbjM
While a different incident, the transcript of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) from 4-23-03 is very educational, in particular statements by Robert F. Thompson, the shuttle program manager from inception to first flight. It covers key shuttle development decisions, development costs, planned flight rate, etc (do right-click and save as): https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/PDFS/VOL6/H08.PDF If problems opening this, use top-level link and select "H.8 April 23,2003 Houston,Texas" : https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/html/VOL6.html
A quick heads-up, this week is the 30th anniversary of the Challenger Shuttle disaster
http://history.nasa.gov/Apollo204/
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Old Lyme, Connecticut
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While a different incident, the transcript of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) from 4-23-03 is very educational, in particular statements by Robert F. Thompson, the shuttle program manager from inception to first flight. It covers key shuttle development decisions, development costs, planned flight rate, etc (do right-click and save as): https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/PDFS/VOL6/H08.PDF If problems opening this, use top-level link and select "H.8 April 23,2003 Houston,Texas" : https://www.nasa.gov/columbia/caib/html/VOL6.html