Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 maintenance status

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 maintenance status

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jan 2016, 07:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Birmingham
Age: 39
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 maintenance status

Hello folks,

Just being curious about them. I know that we have to take down the bleed status into the tech logbook after shutdown the engines. What are the others for and any nice rule of thumb for them?

Thanks
Speedwinner is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 07:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

As you know the AIR BLEED maintenance message is the only item that has a dispatch condition and therefore a troubleshooting must be undertaken before the next flight. For all the other maintenance messages a dispatch is granted without condition (unless your airline MEL policy is more restrictive on that matter) provided that the message is cleared within its repair interval (C or D). As the airplane must undergo a daily check where these issues can be taken care of, I do not see any reason to write in the tech log any other item other than the AIR BLEED for the reason stated above.
sonicbum is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 07:44
  #3 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Operators' policies and procedures seem to differ significantly. If you read the OEM documentation strictly, it seems Airbus want you to treat it like a regular MEL item.

FCOM PRO-NOR-SOP-22-A
STS pb (ECAM Control panel)...................................................... ..................PRESS
Check the STATUS page.

If maintenance status messages are displayed, Refer to MMEL/MI-00-08 ECAM and MAINTENANCE STATUS.

MMEL*
HANDLING OF MAINTENANCE MESSAGES DISPLAYED ON ECAM STATUS PAGE

At the head of each ATA chapter of this MEL, the related MAINTENANCE messages which may be displayed on ECAM STATUS page are listed with the indication of the associated dispatch status.

A MAINTENANCE message indicates the presence of a category of failure which can only be identified by the interrogation of CFDS.
Operators must implement procedures to manage MAINTENANCE messages and associated CFDS messages, to handle faults recording and repair within the rectification interval of category C (10 days). All MAINTENANCE messages have a rectification interval C except the following messages : DAR, DMU and QAR which have an interval D.

Dispatch with a MAINTENANCE message displayed on ECAM STATUS page is allowed without specific conditions except for the following messages :
- AIR BLEED : Refer to MMEL 36-00-01.
- DMC 1/3: Refer to Item 31-00-05 DMC 1/3 MAINTENANCE Message
- DMC 2/3: Refer to Item 31-00-06 DMC 2/3 MAINTENANCE Message

It is left to the operator to define the role devoted to flight crew and/or maintenance personnel in these procedures.
regards, FD.

*: not really sure if this is the 100% verbatim copy of MMEL, may had been edited by the operator.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 5th Jan 2016 at 07:54.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 08:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 383
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's certainly not a memory item, ours used to be the same as above, bleed and DMC's that is, but it has now changed based upon different MSN's various SB's, mods, etc. Simply put, you have to refer to the DDG/MEL overtime.

We don't have a specific requirement to make note of it in the tech log at the end of flight unless of course there is a message on ECAM.

Speedwinner,

Perhaps the question you're asking can be answered by noting the purpose of the maintenance status page. In short it was designed to provide data for the engineers that was not relevant during the flight in which the fault was detected, that is, it will not affect the pilots for this flight, however they'll be notified after landing that they need the engineers to come and look at something prior to another dispatch.

Nowadays of course, with the advent of low cost carriers, it cannot be assumed that there will be an engineer to notify if (m) action is indeed required. That probably wasn't considered when the aircraft was designed however as there was no such thing as a low cost carrier, engineers were abound, pilots got paid moorland it's possible the world was just a better place ;-) how things have changed.
Willie Nelson is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 11:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Birmingham
Age: 39
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys!
Speedwinner is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 09:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just like to add that as an engineer I believe that it is a good idea to annotate Flt Ctrl maint message in the log book. The crew turn off the IRS and leave the flight deck, this puts Flt Ctrl Maint status ON as a standing warning. When I action daily check, I do not align the IRS to check if there is a Flt Ctrl warning there.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2016, 10:34
  #7 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Steve, if I read you correctly: For daily check you do not energize the IRSs. There is a MAINT message F/CTL, that is associated with this de-powered state. In consequence, it is assumed that F/CTL is the result of IRS being off and not an other F/CTL message, that could be visible before securing the flightdeck. Correct?
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2016, 12:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: biq
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rationals about MAINT STS on A320

Dear All,

My little contribution:

- for reasons given in the quotes above, a MEL should be opened for any MAINT STS displayed.
- at beginnning of each ATA, in the MEL Item Chapter, you have the reference of the MEL item to open for a MAINT STS
- condition or not for DMC and BLEED MAINT STS: yes, this depends on configuration of your aircraft: MSN, MOD/SB status. Master MEL should give you which condition applies or not.

Regarding the F/CTRL MAINT STS noticed during pre-flight checks, this is a recurring question I've had with various airlines, and if this helps you, I give you my genral recommendation:
- pre flight checks are under reponsibility of the Maintenance
- aircraft preparation is under responsibilities of the crew (FCOM-NOR-SOP)
- pre flight check lists must be developped by each airline
- indeed, with ADIRUs are Off, you will have F/CTL MAINT STS message, because many computers (ELACs,SECs, SFCC) uses inputs from ADIRUs

Yes, I saw airlines not asking for ADIRUs to be turned On for the pre flight/daily check. There is no obligation to turn them On for the pre-flight/daily, unless your airline or AA asks for it.

However, as per the sequence of FCOM actions, when crew prepares the aircraft:
- they will first align ADIRUs
- only after, they will press STS P/B at the ECP to check if any MAINT STS is present
- If any MAINT STS is present, they will certainly (and this is an obligation) call the maintenance for opening the corresponding MEL item and this might generate a delay

As a conclusion:
- yes, there is no obligation to align ADIRU during pre flight/daily check
- but you take risk not to detect a MAINT STS that would be noticed by flight crew after aligning ADIRUs, and generating a delay that would certainly be charged to the maintenance

So, why not being pro-active an ask to modify pre-flight/daily checklists used by Maintenace, asking for ADIRU to be turned On before checking STS page (and turning them Off after check)?

That's the recommendation I make to all airline I worked with, and certainly some delays have been avoided, because trouble shooting started before crew arrival.

I wish you all a happy new year
jetstream_biq is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.