NG LE FLAPS TRANSIT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NG LE FLAPS TRANSIT
You know you love me.
Bar a TE flaps disagreement, why do the other options lead you to a flaps 15 landing.
Is it because a flaps 30,40 landing requires more 'equal' LE flap and therefore because you are assuming it is stuck partly in the extend position, you are limited to a Flaps 15?
Thanks
Pin
Bar a TE flaps disagreement, why do the other options lead you to a flaps 15 landing.
Is it because a flaps 30,40 landing requires more 'equal' LE flap and therefore because you are assuming it is stuck partly in the extend position, you are limited to a Flaps 15?
Thanks
Pin
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See, I would reference it for you but quite frankly, your attitude and lack of respect for people who are contributing to the thread has resulting in me not helping you out on this occasion.
I would be very surprised if anyone does. To add to Denti's comment, I am also wondering about your current companies training department, or lack of it.
I would be very surprised if anyone does. To add to Denti's comment, I am also wondering about your current companies training department, or lack of it.
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: FL490
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pin Head, although I am a strong advocate for sharing knowledge and experiences, I would also like to ask you a question...
Please answer honestly --
Are you one of those (many) pilots with a certain LCC with low hours and more autopilot time than actual stick and rudder time?
Edit --
I understand that I will get a lot of negativity from my aforementioned remarks but I am just disgusted with pilots who fly with a certain LCC on zero hour contracts and are happily treated like pondlife. Where has conmon sense gone and where is this industry heading towards?
Please answer honestly --
Are you one of those (many) pilots with a certain LCC with low hours and more autopilot time than actual stick and rudder time?
Edit --
I understand that I will get a lot of negativity from my aforementioned remarks but I am just disgusted with pilots who fly with a certain LCC on zero hour contracts and are happily treated like pondlife. Where has conmon sense gone and where is this industry heading towards?
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well tbh with you the manuals don't specifically tell you the reasons why, more boeings philosophy these days, do the checklists and don't ask why. My own common sense tells me it's because a high lift device ain't doing its lifting!! so a higher speed required as an insurance policy. Whether it's a simple or more complex matter I'm sure the checklist takes worst case scenario. Have a look at the LD curve of a clean wing vs one with LE devices deployed and it's effects on critical angle, then you can probably take a few good guesses at Boeings reasoning behind the checklist.
Happy to share my simplistic view
Happy to share my simplistic view
Last edited by McBruce; 14th Oct 2015 at 22:33.
Calm down everyone.
This is the Tech Log so it's perfectly reasonable to ask questions whether or not such information is available elsewhere.
The manuals generally do not give detailed explanations for non-normal procedures and training departments are generally primarily/solely interested in recurrent training, checking and recruiting.
LCC have nothing to do with this. I know of countless former LCC pilots who were eagerly recruited by the legacy carriers and former charter airlines. Most pilots have learned their basics in the same FTOs anyway.
However, those asking questions ought to show humility when talking to their peers.
As for the actual point raised: I suspect McBruce is right. I'd only add that controllability and stall margins undoubdtedly favour a higher speed and less tampering with the configuration.
This is the Tech Log so it's perfectly reasonable to ask questions whether or not such information is available elsewhere.
The manuals generally do not give detailed explanations for non-normal procedures and training departments are generally primarily/solely interested in recurrent training, checking and recruiting.
LCC have nothing to do with this. I know of countless former LCC pilots who were eagerly recruited by the legacy carriers and former charter airlines. Most pilots have learned their basics in the same FTOs anyway.
However, those asking questions ought to show humility when talking to their peers.
As for the actual point raised: I suspect McBruce is right. I'd only add that controllability and stall margins undoubdtedly favour a higher speed and less tampering with the configuration.