Required ground elements Cat II/Cat III
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Required ground elements Cat II/Cat III
As we are supposed to do a missed approach before the DH or AH on low visibility approaches if any of the required elements on the ground becomes inoperative, I would like to see a publication that says what these elements are.
Any info would be appreciated.
Any info would be appreciated.
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look at the downgraded/fail table in Eu-ops or similar.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...99261572,d.ZGU
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...99261572,d.ZGU
Funny guy, I'm pretty sure he's not referring to the LOC or GS
Probably lights, standby power, marker beacons etc etc.
Things that aren't obvious and need a table.
We used to have it in our OPS A but now it's in our NAVTECH guide under:-
-Route documents
-Minima
This table is not intended to be checked below 1,000' AAL, it's up to the commander to continue or not if a failure occurs below 1,000' AAL.
Probably lights, standby power, marker beacons etc etc.
Things that aren't obvious and need a table.
We used to have it in our OPS A but now it's in our NAVTECH guide under:-
-Route documents
-Minima
This table is not intended to be checked below 1,000' AAL, it's up to the commander to continue or not if a failure occurs below 1,000' AAL.
Last edited by ACMS; 2nd Aug 2015 at 10:44.
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good airmanship would suggest that any hiccup that might constitute a threat to aircraft safety on a CAT II/III approach would warrant another turn 'round the pattern, especially if ABOVE DH/AH. I mean, I'm paid by the minute, what's the rush, let's go around and sort out what's going on.
Last edited by john_tullamarine; 3rd Aug 2015 at 02:56. Reason: We really don't need the gratuitous antipathy ..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks 737 and ACMS. It looks like in most cases, the company provides this info to us. However, that does not appear to be the case for me. I was hoping for a link from an official source. The link in the first reply is much appreciated, but appears to be a homemade document with a lot of corrections.
Plus I wonder if there are differences between FAA and European ops.
Plus I wonder if there are differences between FAA and European ops.
Mr Gaul:---maybe but you'd look pretty stupid to do a missed approach if the approach lights failed in CAT3......some things we just should know where to look up quickly.
Last edited by ACMS; 3rd Aug 2015 at 07:05.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, Mr ACMS, which is why I specified a "hiccup that might constitute a threat to aircraft safety". Approach lights failure would probably not qualify for such a designation seeing as in a true CAT III situation I might not see them even if they're operating peachily.