Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine Bearings.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine Bearings.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2002, 15:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine Bearings.

Hi,
I understand how for example an oil pressure bearing works on the turbo on my car, or how the shell bearings work on the crank; but both of these have no real thrust transmitted onto the bearings laterally…i.e. in my car engine or turbo, the shaft isn’t being ‘pulled.’ On both piston and turbine aircraft engines, how is the thrust produced by the prop or fans transmitted to the rest of the engine? I assume you effectively have to have 2 bearing surfaces…1 retaining the circumference of the shaft, and a second stopping the shaft moving by being effectively ‘pulled’ by the produced thrust. Sorry if this doesn’t make too much sense….
Cheers,
Tom.
tom775257 is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2002, 15:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Carolina, USA, Planet Earth
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are one or more 'thrust bearings' which can be ball/roller type or plain ('oil') bearings. They might be separate bearings or one bearing may have both functions. Many automotive engines have a thrust face on one of the crank bearings since there is some thrust load due to clutch actuation forces (if a manual transmission). Obviously the loads are much higher on an aircraft engine, however.

Do an internet search on 'thrust bearing' and you'll probably find a lot of info
lunkenheimer is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2002, 18:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes...and one operator tried to use the OLD design bearings in RB.211's, never mind RR advice (what do they know??!)...which led to...bankruptcy.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2002, 23:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A,
Not sure where you are coming from here. As an ex-engineer with a major airline I believe that RR engines are the best one can purchase for any a/c. Apologies for being a tad light, but their bird ingestion testing is the best for example. OK there may have been pylon issues wrt 767's but who else throws frozen chickens into engines as part of their testing ?

Just my two-pennyth worth
Lost_luggage34 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2002, 00:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You miss my point Lost_luggage34, it was the AIRLINE that did not take RR advise, and it cost them dearly.
411A is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2002, 12:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Sandpit
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Surely, using the incorrect/superceeded/non approved bearings in an engine would mean that the engine no longer conformed to the manufacturers specs which would mean that the only way it could be legally flown would be with an NTO (no technical objection) from the manufacturer. Without this the said engine would be illegal, the certifying engineer shouldn't sign for it and even if he did, as it did not meet specs without authority, its' C of A would be invalid.

I have a feeling this is another aviation myth.

mono is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2002, 15:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately mono, not a myth, and a LOT of guys are out of work as a result.
When these RB.211 machines arrived on the property, I asked the DirMaintenance if he was going to send guys to RR for training. His only reply was..."we have no problem with DC-8s, why should we send guys to Derby?"
Big mistake, IMHO.
411A is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 04:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
411A, yeah, good plan - it's just a machine, they must all be the same ....
When will they learn?
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 15:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I was part of that little bearing debacle, I am, with alot of other folks, kinda pissed about losing our jobs because of this cheap judgement.
We had a good thing going, and life on the ole tristar was rather good!!!
Oh well! life goes on, Time to get over it
Willit Run is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 17:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
> I assume you effectively have to have 2 bearing surfaces…

Not always. You can make a bearing handle axial or radial loads, or a combination of both. I'm sure you can find drawings if you
do a web search.
cwatters is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 18:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Ball Brarings take both Axial and Radial loads, thats why all Thrustbearings are Balls.
Brgds
Doc
DoctorA300 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2002, 19:24
  #12 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
Taper Roller bearings can take axial as well as radial loads, they have the bearing surfaces at approximately 45 degrees to each other with rollers in between.

Ball or plain bearings can also be designed to work in the axial plane. Instead of the two bearing surfaces being inside one another like two sections of tube, they oppose one another like a record player turntable (or bicycle wheel) bearing.

If you can't remember record players (Gosh, I'm so old) try imagining two CDs placed on on top of another. The type of bearing to allow them to rotate against each other would be the same type as that required in an engine as a thrust bearing.

Over the years they have all been tried!
ShyTorque is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.