ISA vs Altitude
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
The long version:
The FMC generates optimum and maximum altitude data to assist the flight crew in choosing the best cruise altitude for a given trip. The calculated maximum altitude is used to ensure that the predicted path of the airplane remains within its performance capabilities. This maximum altitude is the lower of the thrust-limited altitude and the limits of the VNAV operational envelope.
The computation of optimum altitude includes an estimate of the climb fuel burn between the current altitude and optimum altitude, unless the airplane is above the optimum altitude. If the current altitude is above the optimum altitude, the computations are performed at the current gross weight.
The thrust- limited altitude is shown for temperatures of ISA, ISA + 10o
C, ISA + 15o C, ISA + 20o C, and has been computed assuming maximum cruise thrust and a residual R/C margin of 100 FPM.
These thrust rating and residual R/C margins are the standard FMC defaults used to calculate the thrust-limited altitude during the climb flight phase.
Both assume standard day temperature conditions. The thrust-limited altitudes determined may be corrected for other temperature conditions and residual rate of climb values.
The FMC generates optimum and maximum altitude data to assist the flight crew in choosing the best cruise altitude for a given trip. The calculated maximum altitude is used to ensure that the predicted path of the airplane remains within its performance capabilities. This maximum altitude is the lower of the thrust-limited altitude and the limits of the VNAV operational envelope.
The computation of optimum altitude includes an estimate of the climb fuel burn between the current altitude and optimum altitude, unless the airplane is above the optimum altitude. If the current altitude is above the optimum altitude, the computations are performed at the current gross weight.
The thrust- limited altitude is shown for temperatures of ISA, ISA + 10o
C, ISA + 15o C, ISA + 20o C, and has been computed assuming maximum cruise thrust and a residual R/C margin of 100 FPM.
These thrust rating and residual R/C margins are the standard FMC defaults used to calculate the thrust-limited altitude during the climb flight phase.
Both assume standard day temperature conditions. The thrust-limited altitudes determined may be corrected for other temperature conditions and residual rate of climb values.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 7
From: N/A
Does this mean in case of weather colder than standard (ISA minus) there will be higher density and optimum altitude will increase?
Also is that's why during a temperature inversion optimum altitude equals maximum altitude?
Also is that's why during a temperature inversion optimum altitude equals maximum altitude?
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
When OAT is significantly above ISA: http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/1...ml#post1571598
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
Density aside, temperature itself affects greatly engine performance. The maximum level you can achieve is therefore affected by temperature. It is more convenient to express this effect in terms of ISA dev than in specific temperatures.
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
M2002.
The reason temperature affects engine performance is due to it's relationship with density! You can't put it aside. It is the reason.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_altitude
The reason temperature affects engine performance is due to it's relationship with density! You can't put it aside. It is the reason.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_altitude
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The engine, just like the wing, works on the mass of its working fluid (i.e. air). Mass per unit volume is (TaTaaa!) DENSITY.
So both the airplane and, independently, its engine lose performance as density decreases with altitude, and further decreases with increased temperature.
But you knew all this in your PPL written exam, right?
So both the airplane and, independently, its engine lose performance as density decreases with altitude, and further decreases with increased temperature.
But you knew all this in your PPL written exam, right?
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: In thin air
For turbine engines, density is one effect, temperature is another, particularly near the engine operating limit, which is what we are discussing here. That operating limit is defined by the internal temperatures within the engine, and engine performance is then a function of the ratio between gas temperature limit and ambient temperature. Therefore turbine engine performance parameters are usually normalized with ambient pressure and temperature, not just density.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 7
From: N/A
Thanks everyone. FE Hoppy probably that explains why during temperture inversion or when OAT above ISA the maximum altitude decreases and sometimes they become same as optimum altitude on FMC.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
Gysbreght, you know your staff
Floppy, when I say
…
I mean apart from densite, or in addition to the density factor.
English is not my mother tongue, anyway
I know that density has an effect on engine performance, but temperature by itself also has an effect on engine performance. however Gysbreght explained it much better
Barit1, mass flow is mass per unit time, not volume
For turbine engines, density is one effect, temperature is another, particularly near the engine operating limit, which is what we are discussing here. That operating limit is defined by the internal temperatures within the engine, and engine performance is then a function of the ratio between gas temperature limit and ambient temperature. Therefore turbine engine performance parameters are usually normalized with ambient pressure and temperature, not just density.
Density aside,
I mean apart from densite, or in addition to the density factor.
English is not my mother tongue, anyway
I know that density has an effect on engine performance, but temperature by itself also has an effect on engine performance. however Gysbreght explained it much better
Barit1, mass flow is mass per unit time, not volume
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Again I will just comment that the OP is talking about optimum and maximum altitude. At optimum altitude you are no where near the engines TET limit due to the ambient being minus bejesus. The answer to the OP is density.
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: West of Offa's dyke
But the OP asked about optimum AND maximum altitude. By definition if you are talking about maximum altitude you are talking about operating at maximum cruise power and the TET limit that goes with that.
Although you can say that thrust varies with density that is not a complete statement. A more accurate statement would be that at a given rpm thrust varies with density.
As temperature above ISA increases the rpm has to be reduced to keep inside the TET limit,
So a full answer to the OP is not as simple as "density"
Although you can say that thrust varies with density that is not a complete statement. A more accurate statement would be that at a given rpm thrust varies with density.
As temperature above ISA increases the rpm has to be reduced to keep inside the TET limit,
So a full answer to the OP is not as simple as "density"
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 1
From: Uh... Where was I?
Also, reduced density has some benefits for Optimum level.
The less the density or the more the temperature the more the TAS for a given Mach, which gives better specific range.
Density is very "good" at low level, and yet the optimum levels are very high, because of specific range. Given that fuel flow is approximately proportional to thrust, for the same EAS you have more TAS at altitude while having the same drag, which needs the same thrust. We get more miles for the same money.
However, for a constant mach number EAS also increases for with increasing temperature, which will increase drag, I suppose, plus compressibility effects compared to same EAS at very low level. Some more thrust is needed with increasing temps, I guess.
It seems to me that there is a direct relationship between MAX and OPT levels, like they depend on the same things. When I fly at MAX, I have noticed that my engines are giving me already maximum thrust. I have literally advanced the thrust levers to TOGA and the N1 did not increase a bit of a bit. I don't know if engine temperature limits play a part in that, or if its something else like rpms, but probably the engine at that condition has more thrust specific fuel consumption than at the optimum level, to the extent that it pays flying at that level instead.
The less the density or the more the temperature the more the TAS for a given Mach, which gives better specific range.
Density is very "good" at low level, and yet the optimum levels are very high, because of specific range. Given that fuel flow is approximately proportional to thrust, for the same EAS you have more TAS at altitude while having the same drag, which needs the same thrust. We get more miles for the same money.
However, for a constant mach number EAS also increases for with increasing temperature, which will increase drag, I suppose, plus compressibility effects compared to same EAS at very low level. Some more thrust is needed with increasing temps, I guess.
It seems to me that there is a direct relationship between MAX and OPT levels, like they depend on the same things. When I fly at MAX, I have noticed that my engines are giving me already maximum thrust. I have literally advanced the thrust levers to TOGA and the N1 did not increase a bit of a bit. I don't know if engine temperature limits play a part in that, or if its something else like rpms, but probably the engine at that condition has more thrust specific fuel consumption than at the optimum level, to the extent that it pays flying at that level instead.
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 720
Likes: 1
From: N5109.2W10.5
Hi Microburst2002,
Why on earth did you feel the need to select TOGA?
If autothrust was engaged, see FCOM, Performance, THR Thrust ratings, MCR Maximum Cruise DEFINITION
"It is the maximum thrust approved for normal cruise.
There is no thrust lever position corresponding to this thrust rating.
It is not displayed to the pilot, and the N1 limit which is displayed in cruise is the maximum climb N1.
The FMGS uses the maximum cruise N1 to compute the aircraft maximum speed.
In manual thrust setting, in cruise, the pilot should limit N1 to the maximum cruise N1 that is equal to the displayed maximum climb N1 minus 1.9 %."
When I fly at MAX, I have noticed that my engines are giving me already maximum thrust. I have literally advanced the thrust levers to TOGA and the N1 did not increase a bit of a bit.
If autothrust was engaged, see FCOM, Performance, THR Thrust ratings, MCR Maximum Cruise DEFINITION
"It is the maximum thrust approved for normal cruise.
There is no thrust lever position corresponding to this thrust rating.
It is not displayed to the pilot, and the N1 limit which is displayed in cruise is the maximum climb N1.
The FMGS uses the maximum cruise N1 to compute the aircraft maximum speed.
In manual thrust setting, in cruise, the pilot should limit N1 to the maximum cruise N1 that is equal to the displayed maximum climb N1 minus 1.9 %."