Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 NG EEC alternate

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 NG EEC alternate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th April 2014 | 19:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
737 NG EEC alternate

Hi,
The QRH states:
2 Thrust levers (both) . . . . . Retard to mid position

This prevents exceeding thrust limits when switching to the EEC alternate mode.
In my mind the thrust levers are already in a 'mid position' when cruising with 88% N1 set. I imagine it provides sufficient buffer to limits and would consider that step satisfied.
Your thoughts?
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2014 | 19:40
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,347
From: Everett, WA
2 Thrust levers (both) . . . . . Retard to mid position
Selecting Alternate mode can occur pretty much anytime during the flight, so the throttles could potentially be anywhere from idle to max climb. Since selecting alternate mode off idle will nearly always result in an increase in N1 - potentially quite sizable - it's a standard instruction to set the throttles to a 'mid' position before selecting Alternate (those words appear for all current production Boeing aircraft).

Obviously, if the throttles are already 'mid' position or lower, there would be no need to retard them.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2014 | 20:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Thanks td.
I understand that. To be more specific with my question, do you think that 88%N1 ( ie a standard cruise setting) is 'mid' enough to prevent any excedance being possible.
Personally I do, but I know of others who would retard the levers further in order to achieve a 'mid' position.
Cheers
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2014 | 20:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Russia
By the way, how can you notice EEC Altn light during routine operations? As far as I remember it doesn't trigger master caution, so if there's no DEU failure with DSPLY SOURCE annunciation you'll hardly ever see it.
Emel.OW is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2014 | 21:14
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,347
From: Everett, WA
Framer, I don't work 737 (I'm a wide body sort of guy ), so I can't really comment on the specifics of the 737 installations. Your answer would probably have to do with the exact cruise conditions and how close you already were to max climb/con power set. But I suspect it is a least possible to exceed the max climb/con rating by selecting alternate mode with the throttle at a 'normal' cruise setting.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2014 | 21:56
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Thanks again.
But I suspect it is a least possible to exceed the max climb/con rating by selecting alternate mode with the throttle at a 'normal' cruise setting.
That really is the crux of the matter in that some people do suspect that, and others ( like myself )don't think it's likely there will be a 11 or 12% increase in N1. Unless I get more info I will be conservative and assume that it is possible as there is nothing to lose by retarding the levers a bit more.
I'm a wide body sort of guy
Don't feel bad. I used to have the same problem until I entered a workplace 'Biggest Loser' competition. I now have so much energy it's amazing.
By the way, how can you notice EEC Altn light during routine operations?
You do get ENG on the master caution panel.
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 19th April 2014 | 09:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
I'd always thought 'mid-position' was physical geometric thing rather than an N1%. Wrong or right?
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th April 2014 | 22:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: In t'sky
RAT 5,

I don't think so, as the thrust levers aren't linearly(?) aligned with the N1, if that makes sense.
MrHorgy is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2014 | 07:03
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
I think you are right Rat 5 but obviously the reason behind the physical mid point is to reduce the actual engine parameters in case the new data base sourced N1 is significantly higher. ( unless I'm completely missing something......it wouldn't be the first time )
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2014 | 13:48
  #10 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,347
From: Everett, WA
Yes, 'mid position' is geometric, but those instructions are common across the current production Boeing fleet - which encompasses a number of both N1 and EPR engines.
So 'mid position' keeps it simple and common.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2014 | 19:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
Just imagine a 'Display Source' indication on your PFD, in Climb..and follow the QRH, on your next flight. This will answer the question.
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2017 | 21:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Casablanca
Speed adjacement

When dispatching with EEC in ALTRN, we should adjust speed.
Why ??
Igrish 747 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2017 | 18:10
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 3,347
From: Everett, WA
Could you be more specific - which speed(s) are you speaking of? And are we still talking 737NG?
I know the EPR engine aircraft typically have a weight penalty associated with Alternate Mode dispatch (due to increased uncertainty in thrust) but I don't recall that being extended to engines with N1 thrust settings (GE/CFM).
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2017 | 18:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 102
From: IRS NAV ONLY
With hard alternate mode (as in EEC ALTN dispatch), the thrust may be higher than the one in normal mode, resulting Vmc(a/g) will be higher and speeds need to be adjusted.
FlyingStone is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd July 2017 | 09:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 4
From: England
Originally Posted by Emel.OW
By the way, how can you notice EEC Altn light during routine operations? As far as I remember it doesn't trigger master caution, so if there's no DEU failure with DSPLY SOURCE annunciation you'll hardly ever see it.

EEC alternate light triggers master caution and ENG on the system annunciator panel.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.