Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 Disengage vs Disconnect

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 Disengage vs Disconnect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jan 2014, 01:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 36,000'
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 Disengage vs Disconnect

The Non normal checklist in the QRH refer to "Disengaging" the A/P. (E.G. Runaway Stabilizer). The Non-Normal Maneuvers states about Disconnecting the A/P.

Why two different words, which mean the same thing.
B737NG_Pilot is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2014, 03:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,197
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
It is probably because two different authors wrote the respective procedures, or something was cut and pasted from an earlier iteration of the manuals.
Were an auditor to pick me up on such a trivial matter, my reaction would probably be to suggest that he get a life.
This stuff happens all the time in the production of complex technical material and is really of no importance in the grand scheme of things, just so long as the meaning is clear.
Though of course those whose first language is not English may sometimes ponder the differences in terminology. It's not as if the French are not just as guilty as the Americans in using more than one word for the same thing.
Still it's better than the British usage of the term 'inflammable' for stuff that quite clearly is 'flammable' ....... (ducks for cover)
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2014, 12:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Some manufacturers attempt to differentiate between the system automaticaly ‘disengaging’ itself due to internal monitoring / safety feature, and the pilot choosing to ‘disconnect’ the system or being required to as part of a procedure.
Or vice versa, or editing differences as above, or just inconsistency.
I can’t locate a ref, but it might have been stated in an SAE standards document.
PEI_3721 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.