Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Speedbrakes related to eng bleed fault

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Speedbrakes related to eng bleed fault

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd December 2013 | 20:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Spain
Speedbrakes related to eng bleed fault

Hello to all, just checking my MEL ATA 35 "engine bleed air supply system", I check that the last condition to dispatch the aircraft is to have all speed brakes operative, I want to understand that is because just in case to loose the other bleed it may take us to perform an emergency descend, (not taking in count apu bleed)....but Im not 100% sure that this is the only reason about the speedbrakes operative in this MEL ITEM.

Any other opinion?

Cheers,
miloase is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd December 2013 | 21:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 5
From: Wor Yerm
I'll have a guess - Does the engine run at a higher flight idle setting if dispatched with this defect? If that is the case then the airbrakes will be required to achieve the required ROD.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2013 | 05:23
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Spain
I dont see that anywhere in the FCOM, as far as I know the idle increases when there is an extra demand of air by any other system, eg anti ice.
miloase is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2013 | 06:14
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 4
From: ???
Isnt iy ATA 36? My guess is that it has something to do with reverse thrust unavailability during Rejected TO
InSoMnIaC is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2013 | 06:26
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 6
From: Here and there
There are 2 conditions for the bleed air fault. Flight level limitation (FL315) or no FL limitation. The only difference in the conditions is the requirement for speed brakes at the no FL limitation case. Although it is not really apparent in any documentations, my best guess would be this is due to the ability to perform an emergency descent within the regulatory time allowance.
seventhreedriver is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd December 2013 | 19:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Craggy Island....the west is best
Surely with the bleeds off, there's more thrust?!
3bars is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2013 | 05:08
  #7 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 602
From: Dark Side of the Moon
It is to do with the time taken to perform an Emergency Descent if the other bleed system fails. There are to MEL's, one says that if Speedbrakes operative you have NO flight level limitation due to the higher rate of descents acheivable with the speedbrake. If the speedbrakes are not operative then you are limited to FL315 to ensure you can get down to 10,000 in the same amount of time.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2013 | 05:14
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
Airbus answered the question about the conjunction of FL-speedbrake-bleed/pack with the ability to descent in a given time to FL100 if the second bleed/pack is lost. IIRC: At the A319 it depends on the type of FWC if the aircraft is able to descent in the given time without speedbrake or not. The MEL reflects that.
IFixPlanes is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2013 | 10:42
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 20
From: My views - Not my employer!
IFP - How does the FWC standard affect the descent rate?

(curious to learn...)
Cough is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2013 | 13:54
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
I think that AI wrote that newer FWC standards give slightly different emergency descent procedures when CAB PR EXCESS CAB ALT ECAM warning is triggered.
IFixPlanes is offline  
Reply
Old 4th December 2013 | 17:08
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Spain
Thanks to all, then is what I thought, but not written anywhere, at least in my MEL....

Regarding the A319 maybe the limitation is a little big higher since the speedbrakes even with Autopilot engaged can deploy full deflexion.

Regards,
miloase is offline  
Reply
Old 7th December 2013 | 19:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Out of radar space
Surely with the bleeds off, there's more thrust?!
In fact this is very true between 0-10,000 ASL. Having the APU Bleed instead of ENG Bleed on will surely cause a better fuel index, so more thrust with less fuel. The magic of oxygen.
Westnest is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.