Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engine-out cruise SFC/Range?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engine-out cruise SFC/Range?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2013, 13:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: everywhere
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine-out cruise SFC/Range?

After reading the A380 engine shutdown thread, I started wondering - how does engine-out SFC and TAS at LRC compare to the "All Engine Operative" case, both for a twin and for a quad?

I am not interested in exact numbers (as they are type- and mass- dependent), but rather physics behind single engine cruise
C_Star is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 13:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL510
Posts: 910
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For a twin it'll depend whether the engines are wing or tail mounted.
Twins with tail mounted engines will occasionally have better specific range on one engine only, while with wing mounted engines there will normally be a loss of specific range, in a dimension of 30% approx.
safelife is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 13:49
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: everywhere
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Safelife!

So, am I right thinking that that the remaining engines operate at higher efficiency (even on a lower cruising FL) and the decrease in performance is due to windmilling and asymmetry drag?
C_Star is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 14:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re SFC: Classical turbojets reached their best SFC at max thrust (TO), and at part throttle, SFC is degraded.

But modern turbofans are tuned to best SFC over a range of normal cruise settings. OEI ops may require pushing the throttle beyond this optimum range.

But every engine is a bit different; your mileage may vary.
barit1 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 18:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
So, am I right thinking that that the remaining engines operate at higher efficiency (even on a lower cruising FL) and the decrease in performance is due to windmilling and asymmetry drag?
Several things come into play: The remaining engine is typically operating well above it's optimal efficiency range and hence is less efficient than during a normal cruise. Cruise altitude is much lower, meaning more drag. Windmilling drag and lots of rudder to compensate for the thrust asymmetry adds more drag.
tdracer is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 21:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: canada
Age: 85
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A B-777 @ 10.000' uses a fraction more fuel with one engine at MCT than with 2 engine at a lower power setting to maintain the same speed, hence fuel to an ETOPS alternate is based on one engine at MCT. It might be caused by trim drag.
tasmin is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 22:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In practical terms, the max altitude with 1 engine inop is significantly lower at high gross weights than the optimum normal cruise altitude. That is the more significant factor in a long-range flight. Comparing SFC at a constant altitude is meaningless for most/all of the flight.
Intruder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.