Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Where exactly can you set take off thrust?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Where exactly can you set take off thrust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Aug 2013, 17:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: -
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where exactly can you set take off thrust?

Hello,

Just discussing this the other day with a colleague and he wondered when precisely can we set take off thrust on a commercial airliner?

So did a bit of reading and wondered what other people might have to say. And also wonder what people think of real-world examples.

According to Jeppesen Text Manual and CAA CAP 168, page 286; Yellow Chevrons means not suitable for use by aircraft except as a stopway. However, in LGW 26L, the Yellow Chevrons are obscured by large white arrows.

The large white arrows are fit for the movement of aircraft according to 168. So we can set take off thrust all the way up to the edge of the yellow chevrons? But not on the yellow chevrons.

However, for some discussion, if you look at Dusseldorf via Google Earth the white arrows stop someway short of the actual tarmac. Now, purely being theoretical, if I entered any runway in DUS I could taxi onto the white arrowed area and set thrust but not on the unpainted/unmarked surface? That seems sensible.

And in another example in FCO, runway 25, preferred departure runway things are less clear. The threshold starts to the left of the the western holding point. And there are no white arrows or yellow chevrons. Where would be the right place precisely to set take off thrust? For example in FCO, the inbounds usually taxi down D or C which is right behind the 25 departure threshold.

I'm interested in what people think, and it's mainly to see other points of view on it.

Regards,

Screwballs
Screwballs is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 00:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Screwballs,
I can remember this incident http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources...CT%2006-07.pdf

Since I have very rarely needed to use TOGA power for take off performance reasons (Flex or assumed temp mostly), then there is plenty of stop margin in the calculations, and a rolling take off is the norm.

On the occasions that I have needed to set TOGA power against the brakes, then we never lined up as G- DOCT did.
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 00:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Without knowing the runways concerned, look at the runway length on your performance charts and cross reference that with the RDA / ASDA.

That will show you your answer.
compressor stall is online now  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 12:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
at san francisco, the question was the same...answered when sign was posted:

takeoff thrust from this point. or something like that...had to do with cars driving near threshold of one left/right and location of blast fence.

threshold marks make sense so use that.
flarepilot is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 12:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
Keeping in mind that the threshold markings generally are dictated by landing rather than takeoff as I understand (caveat - not an airports engineer).

With any luck, Overrun (who is) will come into the discussion and set us right.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 13:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Recollect following another aircraft at GLA which, as it turned onto the runway and applied power, detached a couple of large slabs of tarmac which tumbled off downwind.
Basil is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 16:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Perhaps the intent is to prevents scenes like this:

EEngr is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 18:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
EEngr, Yes, flew B747s in there a few times. Silly people - could wreck their eyes and, although there's a wire mesh fence, a lump of paving in the face could seriously offend
Or perhaps I'm just an old, risk-averse, joyless barsteward

Last edited by Basil; 24th Aug 2013 at 18:24.
Basil is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2013, 21:37
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: -
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheers for the replies. It is a bit more of an obscure question!

The AAIB report is fascinating. Very useful food for thought for a contaminated runway, TOGA departure with ice accretion (ie run ups before the roll to shed blade icing) situation.

Out of curiosity, where is the eastern most point you would set thrust departing off runway 25 in FCO?

Thanks,

Screwballs
Screwballs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.