Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Optimum Altitude for a PC12 Pilatus

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Optimum Altitude for a PC12 Pilatus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jul 2013, 11:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: germany
Age: 58
Posts: 210
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
This may help you to find the optimum altitude:

PILATUS PC12 -45
Maximum Cruise Power
Max Take Off Weight
No Wind
No Alternate

100 NM
Alt time fuel
22000 00:33 255
20000 00:33 258
18000 00:33 259
16000 00:33 263
14000 00:32 267
12000 00:32 273
10000 00:32 282
8000 00:32 286
6000 00:32 295

200 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 01:00 403
26000 00:59 409
24000 00:58 416
22000 00:57 424
20000 00:57 436
18000 00:57 447
16000 00:56 458
14000 00:56 472
12000 00:56 484

300NM
Alt time fuel
28000 01:25 547
26000 01:23 561
24000 01:22 577
22000 01:21 593
20000 01:20 614
18000 01:20 634
16000 01:20 654
14000 01:20 676
12000 01:20 696

400NM
Alt time fuel
28000 01:50 692
26000 01:48 713
24000 01:46 737
22000 01:45 763
20000 01:44 792
18000 01:44 821
16000 01:44 850
14000 01:44 881
12000 01:45 908

500NM
Alt time fuel
28000 02:15 836
26000 02:12 866
24000 02:10 897
22000 02:09 932
20000 02:08 970
18000 02:08 1008
16000 02:07 1046
14000 02:08 1085
12000 02:09 1120

600 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 02:40 981
26000 02:37 1018
24000 02:34 1058
22000 02:33 1101
20000 02:32 1148
18000 02:32 1196
16000 02:31 1242
14000 02:32 1290
12000 02:33 1332

700 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 03:05 1125
26000 03:01 1170
24000 02:59 1218
22000 02:57 1270
20000 02:55 1325
18000 02:55 1383
16000 02:55 1437
14000 02:56 1494
12000 02:57 1544

800 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 03:29 1270
26000 03:26 1322
24000 03:23 1379
22000 03:21 1439
20000 03:19 1503
18000 03:19 1570
16000 03:18 1633
14000 03:20 1966
12000 03:21 1756

900 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 03:54 1415
26000 03:50 1447
24000 03:47 1539
22000 03:45 1609
20000 03:43 1681
18000 03:43 1757
16000 03:42 1829
14000 03:43 1903
12000 03:45 1968

1000 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 04:19 1559
26000 04:14 1626
24000 04:11 1699
22000 04:09 1778
20000 04:07 1859
18000 04:07 1944
16000 04:06 2025
14000 04:07 2108
12000 04:09 2179

1100 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 04:44 1704
26000 04:39 1779
24000 04:35 1860
22000 04:33 1947
20000 04:30 2037
18000 04:30 2132
16000 04:29 2221
14000 04:31 2312
12000 04:34 2391

1200 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 05:09 1848
26000 05:03 1931
24000 04:59 2020
22000 04:57 2116
20000 04:54 2215
18000 04:54 2319
16000 04:53 2417
14000 04:55 2517
12000 04:58 2603

1300 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 05:33 1993
26000 05:28 2083
24000 05:23 2180
22000 05:21 2285
20000 05:18 2393
18000 05:18 2506
16000 05:17 2612

1400 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 05:58 2137
26000 05:52 2235
24000 05:48 2341
22000 05:45 2455
20000 05:42 2571
18000 05:42 2693

1500 NM
Alt time fuel
28000 06:23 2282
26000 06:17 2387
24000 06:12 2501
22000 06:09 2624

There is no performance data for 720° available.
Our -45 aircraft is not RVSM aproved, so my performance calculator doesnt show any data above FL280.

Last edited by inbalance; 4th Jul 2013 at 11:23.
inbalance is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2013, 16:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This sounds like a fairly strange question coming from someone who supposedly flies the actual airplane for an actual company. Then his handle is 737lover. Anyone else suspect we're dealing with a simmer?
flyboyike is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2013, 16:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: germany
Age: 58
Posts: 210
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Anyone else suspect we're dealing with a simmer?
No, because the 720° ITT Pilatus recommends for the B engine you donīt find in the POH and also not on the internet.

This sounds like a fairly strange question coming from someone who supposedly flies the actual airplane for an actual company.
The data is in the POH, but one has to calculate every distance and altitude.
The data above takes a week to be calculated by hand.

Last edited by inbalance; 4th Jul 2013 at 17:10.
inbalance is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2013, 15:39
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dar
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To inbalance

You are a Star that I don't know but maybe one day I will. This information is exactly what I was looking for and now I have it and as far as I'm concerned! This chapter is closed. Will ask you more Qs if necessary through PM. You have just added 100 years more for me to Fly probably by help of God. Let me know when you come to Tanzania one day.
Cheers!
B737 lover is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 13:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
now adjust these numbers for a 30kt at 14k or 85kt at fl220

300NM
Alt time fuel
28000 01:25 547
26000 01:23 561
24000 01:22 577
22000 01:21 593
20000 01:20 614
18000 01:20 634
16000 01:20 654
14000 01:20 676
12000 01:20 696
rigpiggy is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2013, 18:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: germany
Age: 58
Posts: 210
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
now adjust these numbers for a 30kt at 14k or 85kt at fl220
Head or Tailwind?
inbalance is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 01:42
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
CYXE0300 270/049 +10 -046270/048 +10 -045269/047 +11 -043268/045 +11 -042 CYXE0250 268/050 +09 -046268/048 +10 -044268/047 +10 -043268/045 +10 -042 CYXE0200 263/045 +08 -040264/044 +09 -039266/043 +10 -040267/042 +11 -039 CYXE0150 264/040 +08 -037265/039 +09 -036266/039 +10 -036268/038 +11 -035 CYXE0100 261/038 +08 -034263/037 +09 -034265/037 +10 -034267/036 +11 -033 CYXE0050 256/033 +08 -029259/033 +09 -029261/033 +09 -029263/032 +10 -029 Avg. Trip Winds=> - 38 Headwind - 37 Headwind - 37 Headwind - 36 Headwind FLT TIME==> 1:57(+01) 246TAS 1:56(+00) 250TAS 1:55(-01) 251TAS 1:54(-02) 253TAS Fuel Burn==> 840 Lbs 852 Lbs 873 Lbs 891 Lbs
rigpiggy is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 01:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: yyz
Posts: 100
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
last from fltplan.com, ywg-yxe. as you can see you would gain no real benefit from going higher except better gliding range. within 50# burn but faster block speed, engines running cooler, and less time in the climb
rigpiggy is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2013, 12:13
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dar
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks a lot rigpiggy. All copied
B737 lover is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.