Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Microburst...


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Microburst...

Old 19th May 2013 | 21:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
Microburst...

Given the recent 737-8 incident, there are many responses regarding a microburst potential. The following is provided as information, and should certainly clear up the understanding of microburst mechanics....

Wet Microburst (AUS BoM)

.
Dry Microburst (AUS BoM)

.
FAA understanding of Microburst

.
University understanding of Microburst (UW Atmospheric Sciences)

.
US Airforce understanding of Microburst

.
NOAA understanding of Microburst

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 19th May 2013 at 21:23.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2013 | 00:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 2
From: Australia
Yep seen this before, nothing new.

The Lionair 738 didn't have a Microburst or Severe Windshear encounter.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2013 | 02:14
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
nit,

IF you were able to READ, and COMPREHEND the first line of the post, it is in regards to posts about the potential.

SO, you have seen it before, why bother to respond?

Perhaps you should concentrate on providing information, rather than trolling the forum, and posting garbage.

Edit: BTW...the INTENT of the post was to illustrate that the different entities have fundamental differences in understanding the mechanics of a microburst...

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 20th May 2013 at 02:32.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2013 | 04:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Much as I'VE seen this before, there are doubtless newbies and wannabes on the site that haven't- so thanks FP, the effort is appreciated.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 20th May 2013 | 06:04
  #5 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 410
Likes: 87
From: EASA territory
IF you were able to READ, and COMPREHEND the first line of the post, it is in regards to posts about the potential. SO, you have seen it before, why bother to respond? Perhaps you should concentrate on providing information, rather than trolling the forum, and posting garbage.
FlightPathOBN, well I wouldn't call this post of him trolling. By saying ' given the recent B737-8 incident...' you're suggesting that the LIONAIR crew might have an excuse after encountering a microburst (while they had not) They simply did not go around at the minima, continuing to look for the runway until 20' RA.

The Lionair crew simply does not deserve the credit that you (inadvertently?) give them and that IS worth a serious reply.
sabenaboy is online now  
Reply
Old 20th May 2013 | 15:29
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: engineer at large
Okay, there were many posts on the Lionair thread about the possibility of microburst.

Given that the responses were all over the place on microburst, prevailing cloud cover, microburst detection, etc,... the intent of the post was to provide information to posters on this board about microburst mechanics.

It has nothing to do with the Lionair incident....

And here I was going to post about how about the differences between the different manufacturers of microburst detection systems on the aircraft....
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.