Route Discontinuities
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Venezuela
Route Discontinuities
Hello everybody!
I have a question regarding the 757/767 FMC, specifically when entering arrivals that end in "expect radar vectors to final approach", like CAMRN4 in JFK or FLIPR2 and FOWEE5 in MIA. Should I leave the discontinuity between the final waypoint in the STAR and the IAF? Or should I close the discontinuity even though I know I'm not going to fly that course?
Thanks!
I have a question regarding the 757/767 FMC, specifically when entering arrivals that end in "expect radar vectors to final approach", like CAMRN4 in JFK or FLIPR2 and FOWEE5 in MIA. Should I leave the discontinuity between the final waypoint in the STAR and the IAF? Or should I close the discontinuity even though I know I'm not going to fly that course?
Thanks!


Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,984
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
I leave the "discont" in until I now ATC's plan for vectors. Reason being, the plane WILL fly the track between the last waypoint of the STAR to the IAF, if no action it taken to go to HDG mode and ATC would not like that.
Last edited by galaxy flyer; 29th March 2013 at 20:44.
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,222
Likes: 984
From: Seat 1A
The FMC will calculate a direct route between the last waypoint of the STAR and the IAF. The question is, to connect those points or not?
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Smogsville
Leave it in. It's a reminder that you don't have a clearance after the empty boxes. That's our SOP.
I prefer the discon method.
Last edited by SMOC; 30th March 2013 at 04:55.





