Emergency offsetting in the NAT tracks
Thread Starter

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Emergency offsetting in the NAT tracks
Years ago when I few the north atlantic, I believe the emergency procedure to descend withing the track structure was to acquire a distance of 30 nm offset. Now if I understand correctly, it has changed to 15 nm. Seeing as the tracks are still 60 miles apart, can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?
Or, am I out to lunch on this?
Or, am I out to lunch on this?

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 105
From: The Winchester
can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?
( Sounds unlikely but AFAIK the change came out in the wash up of events on the NATS during 9/11)
Last edited by wiggy; 1st February 2013 at 11:34.
Thread Starter

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
thanks wiggy. that makes a lot of sense for weather diversions, and for that reason aircraft are to climb/descend 300 feet depending on track, and thus avoiding other aircraft doing the same. After all, if weather affects one aircraft, it's likely to affect others.
An engine failure seems to be a totally different animal. Not a short term diversion, but perhaps an hour or two of flying where posssibly another aircraft is within 15 miles (plus or minus) plus 500 feet altitude difference. I'm just surprised it isn't 30 miles for an engine failure, that's all.
30 miles seemed to work before....
An engine failure seems to be a totally different animal. Not a short term diversion, but perhaps an hour or two of flying where posssibly another aircraft is within 15 miles (plus or minus) plus 500 feet altitude difference. I'm just surprised it isn't 30 miles for an engine failure, that's all.
30 miles seemed to work before....
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Originally Posted by hawk37
Seeing as the tracks are still 60 miles apart, can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Originally Posted by wiggy
Sounds unlikely but AFAIK the change came out in the wash up of events on the NATS during 9/11
Must have been a real nightmare on Shanwick HF ...

Joined: Jul 2008
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: MA, USA
Did any turn back or were they all routed and landed in Canada if they were already in the air?
Operation Yellow Ribbon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Operation Yellow Ribbon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




