Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Emergency offsetting in the NAT tracks

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Emergency offsetting in the NAT tracks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st February 2013 | 09:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Emergency offsetting in the NAT tracks

Years ago when I few the north atlantic, I believe the emergency procedure to descend withing the track structure was to acquire a distance of 30 nm offset. Now if I understand correctly, it has changed to 15 nm. Seeing as the tracks are still 60 miles apart, can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?

Or, am I out to lunch on this?
hawk37 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2013 | 11:25
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 105
From: The Winchester
can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?
Yes, here's one reason - old system, westbound tracks: Aircraft on track B has a problem and crew decide to offset 30 left, meanwhile another aircraft on track C has a problem and crew decide to offset 30 right....and..........

( Sounds unlikely but AFAIK the change came out in the wash up of events on the NATS during 9/11)

Last edited by wiggy; 1st February 2013 at 11:34.
wiggy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2013 | 11:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
thanks wiggy. that makes a lot of sense for weather diversions, and for that reason aircraft are to climb/descend 300 feet depending on track, and thus avoiding other aircraft doing the same. After all, if weather affects one aircraft, it's likely to affect others.

An engine failure seems to be a totally different animal. Not a short term diversion, but perhaps an hour or two of flying where posssibly another aircraft is within 15 miles (plus or minus) plus 500 feet altitude difference. I'm just surprised it isn't 30 miles for an engine failure, that's all.

30 miles seemed to work before....
hawk37 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2013 | 13:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Originally Posted by hawk37
Seeing as the tracks are still 60 miles apart, can anyone come up with the reason for making the distance 15 nm vice 30 nm?
Or is it in preparation to later set the tracks 30 miles apart ... ?
CONF iture is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2013 | 17:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Originally Posted by wiggy
Sounds unlikely but AFAIK the change came out in the wash up of events on the NATS during 9/11
Do we know how many aircrafts about turned back to Europe on that day ?
Must have been a real nightmare on Shanwick HF ...
CONF iture is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2013 | 18:04
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: MA, USA
Did any turn back or were they all routed and landed in Canada if they were already in the air?

Operation Yellow Ribbon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yancey Slide is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2013 | 13:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: W of 30W
Probably when it was obvious that the US access was not possible anymore, many who were in a position to go back to the departure airport did. Shanwick Oceanic should be able to tell.
CONF iture is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2013 | 14:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Wiggy is right, can't see the complication here. If the separation between tracks became 30nm, 15nm would cause the same issue with multiple offset a/c.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.