Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Early Airbus SOP's?

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Early Airbus SOP's?

Old 17th Dec 2012, 17:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Early Airbus SOP's?

I am fairly new to the Bus and started wondering how the A320 sop's/operating philosophy has changed over time. Nowadays, they seem pretty conventional (with few exceptions). I wonder what they were like in the late 80's/early 90's when the BUS was brand new and sold as "my maid could fly it", fully automatic airplane. Any thoughts, or references?

Cheers

Stuck

Last edited by Stuck_in_an_ATR; 17th Dec 2012 at 17:43.
Stuck_in_an_ATR is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2012, 01:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: canada
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOPs

For me, the big problem with SOPs is when Chief Pilots who think they know more than the manufacturer start fiddling with them. I have seen so many changes to SOPs over the years by management, changes that were quite stupid and had nothing to do with the original ones supplied by the manufacturer. In one case I had to e-mail the builder for clarification after enduring mass problems with a change done by a large operator and passed by the Government Aviation folks. The reply was " That is why we told you to do it this way". Some don't realize that if you change the SOPs and have an accident, the manufacturer may turn their backs on you.
Unless you design, build, flight test, certify and write the manuals for a particular 'plane, don't mess with the SOPs.
T
thermostat is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2012, 02:41
  #3 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Essentially, if all lights were out, everything was okay then one programmed the FMGEC...

Now that's a bit of a simplification, but not by much. The check was called a "flow" (as it is sometimes now called for other types). In steam airplanes, everything was checked, (all audible/visual warnings), switches were placed and bugs were set. In the A320, one moved one's hand about the overhead as if a genuflection, then over the center panel, the pedestal and finally the Captain's then F/O's panel then one did the FMGC entries from the flight plan.

As for chief pilots changing SOPs, it is well understood that airlines can do what they want with SOPs providing they do not permit more than the manufacturer does in their generic SOPs. The SOPs I was familiar with were in my view disciplined, detailed and excellent and dovetailed with other types in the fleet. During CCQ, (cross-crew qualification) we were required to adopt "The Flow" for a while but returned to the detailed work that was familiar to all. Not a pleasant time, as new SOPs were coming overnight by the trainload. Thank heaven it was sorted out.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2012, 21:09
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi!

Thanks for replies. What I am trying to learn is how much has been changed due to various incidents that showed up during the type's service life. Does anyone, perchance, have copies of early FCOM3/FCTM?
Stuck_in_an_ATR is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.