Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 FAMILY ENGINE START SQUENCE

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 FAMILY ENGINE START SQUENCE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2012, 19:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ISTANBUL
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow A320 FAMILY ENGINE START SQUENCE

Hi all bus drivers,

According to Airbus FCOM second engine is to be started after the gray background has disappeared.

I saw on an Airbus presentation saying that the second engine can be started after the first engines start valve is closed. But Airbus is not recommending this procedure.

I am wondering how you are currently performing it ?

We are doing it as per FCOM currently but I am also thinking it might save fuel and time. The only bad side is I think if after the valve closes there is a stall or high EGT and the start is aborted there is no immediate air to crank that engine.


Thanks in advance
guclu is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 07:53
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Inter Nations
Age: 40
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Safety before savings!!
DutchOne is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 11:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Is five or ten seconds going to make any difference?
compressor stall is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 11:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More than 1000 flights a day times 5 seconds= 5000 seconds less idle fuel burn=big bonuses all round!
PENKO is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 12:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my company he have to note the peak EGT for each start, so I generally start number 1 after that.
A320baby is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 12:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can start the remaining engine a bit earlier and still note peak EGT.


All very non standard of course, and if you get it wrong...
PENKO is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2012, 13:55
  #7 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,178
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
The Airbus FCOM procedure is a cover all for all situations. There is always a chance that a start may abort and require additional bleed to motor the engine before a restart.

The two engine types also behave differently during the start, one is quicker than the other.
swh is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2012, 10:01
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ISTANBUL
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For IAE engines time between valve close and gray background disappear is 20 seconds.

If you have access to Airbusworld you may donwload the Operating Procedure for Cost Saving presented by Airbus (themselves) at the 16th performance and operations conference.

In the presentation they say it is possible. Interesting.
guclu is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2012, 12:25
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ISTANBUL
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think I am confusing.

The time between Start Valve close (Approximately 43%N2) and gray background has disappeared is 20 seconds approximately.

For the CFM engine starts much faster than IAE V2500 series.
guclu is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.