Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 Flap Trim Repair - Bad Communication Judgment

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 Flap Trim Repair - Bad Communication Judgment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th July 2012 | 18:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
From: USA
737 Flap Trim Repair - Bad Communication Judgment

Flying N611AS on Saturday as a passenger, looked out the window to see the following "notation" on the flap: http://i.imgur.com/Rr9wN.jpg

While I could see that it was a clean cut and too small to be a flight safety issue, the repair crew's method of communication didn't do a lot to instill confidence in their professionalism or general good sense.

Alaska's T w i t t e r support responded that it was a "permanent approved trim repair," but that the "method of communication was not appropriate."

Curious: By "trim repair," they mean trimming the break to a clean curve, and not something to do with the actual aircraft trim, right?

A stencil might be a better alternative to a Sharpie next time...

Last edited by Skyray; 30th July 2012 at 19:01. Reason: forum changed "twitter" to "pprune" which was confusing
Skyray is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2012 | 18:17
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
Maybe it was a message for the passengers seeing the damage.

Not to worry, we know about it and is ok.
flydive1 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th July 2012 | 18:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,562
Likes: 33
From: I wouldn't know.
That made my day Very funny way to communicate that this situation is known and OK.
Denti is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 06:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Curious: By "trim repair," they mean trimming the break to a clean curve, and not something to do with the actual aircraft trim, right?
Correct, nothing to do with aircraft trim.

A stencil might be a better alternative to a Sharpie next time...
A Sharpie is commonly used, however the text isn't. If they wanted to indicate a known repair they should have written the the E.A. (engineering authorization) or PLT number.
Yeelep is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 06:50
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
This is definitely a hint for the passenger...
Love it...
IFixPlanes is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 07:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,804
Likes: 1
That made me smile as well. Only way to make it funnier would be a spelling mistake thrown in.

Wouldn't it normally be declared in the tech log airframe damage sheet as well?

Looks like they do have a control number 6713 in white but must have got many comments from folk that didn't know what the number meant.
mad_jock is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 14:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
Had a simiar experience with a missing winglet.

Written with a blue pen: the other one is still there.

Last edited by Capt. Inop; 31st July 2012 at 14:43.
Capt. Inop is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 20:26
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: Ankh Morpork, DW
Meh. It's a -700. Alaska doesn't seem to care as much about those and their appearance. Now, if had been an ETOPS bird, there would have been a nice lei around the bite.
ImbracableCrunk is online now  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 20:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Skyray: The writing will soon disappear, if it hasn't already. I just read a company e-mail compliance briefing about what is allowed to be written adjacent to allowable damage. Below the briefing is your picture as an example of what isn't acceptable.
Yeelep is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2012 | 21:20
  #10 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 480
Likes: 276
From: Sweden
I wonder if the text was an addition after the aircraft was returned to service? Perhaps pax had reported it and someone decided to write that there to reassure the pax on future flights. I do think it's kind of amusing personally.
Avionker is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2012 | 20:03
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 3
From: USA
It's amusing in retrospect, but 100% of the non-aviation-savvy passengers I've showed it to said they would find it alarming. (But also funny, since it wasn't a flight they were on.)

Yeelep, that's awesome that the photo ended up in the compliance briefing! I totally appreciate what the maintenance crew was going for there, but a lot of passengers don't have a good sense of humor about aircraft maintenance at 38,000 feet.
Skyray is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2012 | 07:44
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
What would they have said if they saw the picture of the "damage" without the writing?
flydive1 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2012 | 09:35
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Quite a few would not have recognised it as damage, in spite of the discoloration; the trim is neat and for all many people know that's the shape of the flap, even if they've seen it a hundred times before in its normal shape.

To be recognised as such by all and sundry, damage should look crumpled, jagged, whatever, just obvious; or should have something written on it drawing attention to it.
Capot is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd August 2012 | 10:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch
You could also go along to your local cop shop and borrow one of their "Police Aware" sticky notices...
LurkerBelow is offline  
Reply
Old 6th August 2012 | 23:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: seattle
Skyray?

Skyray, were you the one on the plane? I work at KIRO7 in Seattle. Could you plz email me? jmilstein ( a t ) kirotv. com
jakemilstein is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.