RTOW Chart Opinions
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 1
From: Playing Golf!
RTOW Chart Opinions
Ok, first of all I prefer the LPC. However that aside!
What options do you prefer for RTOW charts? Our current setup (Airbus) is a single chart that display config 1 and 3, options at the bottom for corrections for a wet runway, engine anti ice, and delta QNH.
Would you prefer the charts were presented one config per page? (I know that means more charts) any other items you prefer or dislike?
Many options are available from the PEP just trying to see which are most popular (rather than just going with my personal opinion)
What options do you prefer for RTOW charts? Our current setup (Airbus) is a single chart that display config 1 and 3, options at the bottom for corrections for a wet runway, engine anti ice, and delta QNH.
Would you prefer the charts were presented one config per page? (I know that means more charts) any other items you prefer or dislike?
Many options are available from the PEP just trying to see which are most popular (rather than just going with my personal opinion)
Last edited by PT6A; 10th June 2012 at 20:59.
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 202
From: Here and there
Our company are moving from single flap per page to having a single page with the optimum flap setting. The chart has an RTOW and a flap setting for each temperature/wind intersection. At the bottom are corrections for QNH and icing equipment. Those charts will be in a daily use folder but the entire set of charts with data for all flap settings will still be in the aircraft library. It hasn't been put into practice yet but I like the idea.
