Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Can anyone explain me the theory of light test in B737NG?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Can anyone explain me the theory of light test in B737NG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th June 2012 | 10:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: earth
Can anyone explain me the theory of light test in B737NG?

During rescent flights , when doing the light test , I got a question, it looks like when put the light test switch in test position , it not just test the bulb of each light, because when some CB pop out , the related system light are extinguished but the bulb of that light is OK. so may i take a guess that the light test is not only test the bulb , but also the status of each system work ? can any system expert explain me how the light test work? i think i will learn more form you reply. THX
sky-738 is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 12:07
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 31
From: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
It tests the lamps, not a functional test of any systems.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 13:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
Theory of the B737 ng LIGHT TEST :

It TESTS the LIGHTS of the B737 ng.
de facto is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 14:25
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: earth
amp,
when you pull out a CB, say the speedbrake.the related light(speed brake arm) will not illuminate when doing the test. but the lamps issssssss OK. when you reset the CB, everything returns nomal and good.WHY?
sky-738 is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 19:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: London
If you pull any circuit breaker it interrupts the flow of current from source to destination. Normally a lamp is intended to show if such a flow is passing through such a breaker. So as you have pulled a breaker the lamp goes out. However the TEST circuit is situated ahead of the breaker and if the lamp lights then it means the bulb is okay. My brain hurts. I hope you never have a fire in the APU because a fire can be raging in the tail and suddenly the warning lights go out. That does not mean that the fire is out - the wires to the warning system have burned through... so every lamp has to be isolated in such a way as to test the intended function. My brain doubly hurts. So tired....
mathy is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 20:38
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 46
From: Between a rock and a hard place
Speaking about it, I am curious, anyone knows why the WHEEL WELL FIRE WARNING lamp is not hooked up to the light test?
172_driver is offline  
Old 7th June 2012 | 22:54
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 31
From: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
172 driver, to give pilots engineers and instructors something to ponder.I think they made it the same as the classic.why ? Cant remember.

sky-738 , thats the way it works,pulling the spd brk c/b =no light , pilot thinks hmm something wrong, use NNC or contact engineering. sometimes a light not being on is as much a warning as one being illuminated.
sometimes tripping a breaker will illum a light rather than stop it, ie windshield heat. You have to know your systems and understand what and why you maybe seeing something.
But original point stands, lights test s/w is just that.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 01:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Past the rabbit proof fence
The light test circuit is from the 'master dim and test' system - the actual annunciator side is (usually) powered by its own system c/b.
aveng is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 03:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
amp,
when you pull out a CB, say the speedbrake.the related light(speed brake arm) will not illuminate when doing the test. but the lamps issssssss OK. when you reset the CB, everything returns nomal and good.WHY?
Sky738,

If you do that with me in flight or on the ground, Ill smash your head into the CB panel and then make a light test,see if you illuminate,finally

Last edited by de facto; 8th June 2012 at 03:39.
de facto is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 06:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Likes: 1
From: A tropical island.
de facto,

I hope you're kidding about reacting that way to a CB being pulled.

Otherwise... .

Regarding the subject at hand, I believe the fire handles will remove power from the annunciators for the systems they shut-off / disconnect when pulled, hence lights do not illuminate.

Last edited by aviatorhi; 8th June 2012 at 06:30.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 16:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 102
From: IRS NAV ONLY
Systems schematic manual shows (here - not up to date version) that the speedbrake armed light is tested with the use of auto speedbrake CB, so the auto speedbrake CB should not be tripped in order to show when the lights test switch is set to TEST.
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 18:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
de facto,

I hope you're kidding about reacting that way to a CB being pulled.
Hmmm let me think...of course and I would disembark him just after.

CB are not to be touched on ground,Maintenance only is to reset CBs for other reason than a NNC action, especially in such unecessary case.

Otherwise
Otherwise what? You re gonna pull another CB on me?

Peace

Last edited by de facto; 8th June 2012 at 18:32.
de facto is offline  
Old 8th June 2012 | 19:11
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Likes: 1
From: A tropical island.
Sounds like you've got a few CBs tripped in your braincase.

Last edited by aviatorhi; 8th June 2012 at 19:11.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 04:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
On a serious note and after you get your morning chill pill, do you think it is OK for someone to play around with CBs?
de facto is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 05:15
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 4
From: ???
De facto I think you are the one in need of that chill pill.

It was a hypothetical question. The poor fellow is trying to get a more in depth understanding of the system. he doesn't need your abuse.

btw on some aircraft there are procedures in place to pull and reset a CB on the ground by flight crew. Resetting a tripped CB is another story.
InSoMnIaC is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 07:25
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
I was noooooooot serious in banging his head into the cbs...
de facto is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 08:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: upper hemisphere
I believe de facto was attempting to be humorous. I believe it was somewhat entertaining at least
LeftHeadingNorth is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 10:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Likes: 1
From: A tropical island.
It's a poor attempt at humor, particularly after I asked if it was humor or not.

I see no problem with (as a crew) pulling / resetting CBs (apart from fuel related ones) in flight or on the ground, very useful in troubleshooting and even more useful in disabling systems which aren't performing up to par or are being an annoyance.

One particular airport I flew into regularly a few years ago was not recorded in the TAWS database correctly (database showed it 5 miles away), company responsible for maintenance of said database would not fix it, hence pulling the CB for the warning horns blaring in my ear was the best solution given the circumstance.

Same goes for when I had a stall warning system get stuck in on, scared the **** out of the other guy.

"Recycling" CBs is a non issue for me whatsoever.

As far as resetting is concerned, have no problems with it so long as the system is necessary and consideration is given to the matter.

Last edited by aviatorhi; 9th June 2012 at 10:02.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 14:41
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Home soon
It's a poor attempt at humor, particularly after I asked if it was humor or not.
Reset all you want humour patrol aviator

I have yet to reset a CB in the last 9 years....but if i have to,sure I will.
However if maintenance is around, then they will do so and the appropriate work and log entries related to such action.

Please give us a favour,those nuisance cbs you like to pull out.(and those for your trouble shootings and so forth).make sure you push them back in for the next crew.

Last edited by de facto; 9th June 2012 at 15:13.
de facto is offline  
Old 9th June 2012 | 18:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally Posted by aviatorhi

I see no problem with (as a crew) pulling / resetting CBs (apart from fuel related ones) in flight or on the ground, very useful in troubleshooting and even more useful in disabling systems which aren't performing up to par or are being an annoyance
I didn't see the humour side of pulling /resetting CBs in flight ...very useful in troubleshooting........

Do crew members pulling CBs in flight??? for troubleshooting???
Kuchan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.