Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Procedure Track Approach


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Procedure Track Approach

Old 2nd May 2012 | 11:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: USofA
Procedure Track Approach

Has ANYONE here ever heard the term "Procedure Track Approach" used in a approach clearance. Case in point is a clearance that reads, "Cleared ILS runway 24 Procedure Track Approach"? Airport in question is EINN.

Thanks in advance
Spooky 2 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 11:45
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 845
From: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Never heard of it, and the chart is normal - no notes or notices. If you heard it, I assumed you queried it? Or did you overhear it given to another aircraft?
Checkboard is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 11:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: USofA
Saw it in a unofficial doc that was written by an Air Force C17 guy. Suspect that it may be an USAF term and will check here in an hour or so.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 12:02
  #4 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
This must be the phraseology the controllers use when referring to the full approach from SHA, it's simply a CAT 1 ILS and listed as such at he top of the plate.
Dream Land is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 12:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: USofA
Well that's the point of the question. Is this in fact, the terminolgy that a Shannon ocntroller would use or is it what this AF pilot just thinks he would use? My C17 guy just came in and he thinks that term may be in an AF doc so we are looking for it now.

Have posted this in the ATC section as well so hopefully someone will come forward with an answer.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 12:58
  #6 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
That will be my guess, CAT A/B and C/D have a separate "Tracks" to be followed, but in most of the world, ATC would just clear you for the ILS RW24.
Dream Land is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd May 2012 | 13:25
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
From: USofA
Thanks, but in this case a guess is not good enough
Spooky 2 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2012 | 08:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: up the road
That'd be USAF jargon,yee-ha colloquialisms.
Expect standard ICAO phraseology in Europe.
jacquesbernis is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2012 | 10:01
  #9 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I believe it is a Terps expression, so I guess 'Paddy' had been watching 'Dallas' or whatever and got a bit over-excited
Originally Posted by jb
yee-ha

Last edited by BOAC; 4th May 2012 at 10:16.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2012 | 15:03
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: uk
Spooky 2

Could it possibly mean "expect a procedural approach to the ILS as Radar (vectors) unavailable today" (hopefully notamed.)

Not heard your exact words before but just a thought.
Starbear is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.