Massive Solar Storm
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pearse's Domain
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Massive Solar Storm
Yahoo news :
1) How are flights o the polar routes going to cope or deal with this
if the solar discharge takes only about 8 minutes to reach the earth's
atmosphere?
2) How are PRNAV requirements going to be affected with GPS based FMC
systems?
3)Any known diversions by flights on polar routes due to sudden adverse
changes in space weather?
WASHINGTON (AFP) - A potent solar flare has unleashed the biggest radiation storm since 2005 and could disrupt some satellite communications in the polar regions, US space weather monitors said Monday.
The event started late Sunday with a moderate-sized solar flare that erupted right near the center of the Sun, said Doug Biesecker, a physicist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Space Weather Prediction Center.
"The flare itself was nothing spectacular, but it sent off a very fast coronal mass ejection traveling four million miles per hour (6.4 million kilometers per hour)," he told AFP.
A rush of radiation in the form of solar protons already has begun bombarding the Earth and is likely to continue through Wednesday.
The radiation storm is the largest of its kind since 2005 but still ranks only a three on the scale of one to five, enough to be considered "strong" but not "severe," he added.
NOAA said its website the S3 ranking means "it could, e.g., cause isolated reboots of computers onboard Earth-orbiting satellites and interfere with polar radio communications."
Biesecker said that when it comes to radiation storms, the polar regions are affected most.
For instance, the storm could spell disruptions to airline flights, oil operations, Arctic exploration and space satellites.
Night-sky viewers in Asia and Europe may be able to witness the aurora, or Northern Lights, late Tuesday as a result of the storm.
"We don't expect major impacts from an event like this," Biesecker said.
"It's the people who need GPS (global positioning system) accuracy of centimeters who have to worry, not people who want to know if you're going to turn the car 30 meters (100 feet) ahead."
The event started late Sunday with a moderate-sized solar flare that erupted right near the center of the Sun, said Doug Biesecker, a physicist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Space Weather Prediction Center.
"The flare itself was nothing spectacular, but it sent off a very fast coronal mass ejection traveling four million miles per hour (6.4 million kilometers per hour)," he told AFP.
A rush of radiation in the form of solar protons already has begun bombarding the Earth and is likely to continue through Wednesday.
The radiation storm is the largest of its kind since 2005 but still ranks only a three on the scale of one to five, enough to be considered "strong" but not "severe," he added.
NOAA said its website the S3 ranking means "it could, e.g., cause isolated reboots of computers onboard Earth-orbiting satellites and interfere with polar radio communications."
Biesecker said that when it comes to radiation storms, the polar regions are affected most.
For instance, the storm could spell disruptions to airline flights, oil operations, Arctic exploration and space satellites.
Night-sky viewers in Asia and Europe may be able to witness the aurora, or Northern Lights, late Tuesday as a result of the storm.
"We don't expect major impacts from an event like this," Biesecker said.
"It's the people who need GPS (global positioning system) accuracy of centimeters who have to worry, not people who want to know if you're going to turn the car 30 meters (100 feet) ahead."
1) How are flights o the polar routes going to cope or deal with this
if the solar discharge takes only about 8 minutes to reach the earth's
atmosphere?
2) How are PRNAV requirements going to be affected with GPS based FMC
systems?
3)Any known diversions by flights on polar routes due to sudden adverse
changes in space weather?
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the combination of GPS and IRU, an FMS can be accurate for a long time without GPS updates, once a good initial alignment is obtained. The 744 is not limited if DME updating is available, and limited to 12 hours without GPS or DME updating.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a pretty impressive display of Northern Lights as far south as the 49th parallel last night from about 90W to the Rockies. I was wondering what was causing such a display so far south.
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: auckland, new zealand
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I were younger I would be more worried about high-energy protons pinging bits of my chromasomes than "bit-flips" in computers causing temporary errors.
If your airline isn't monitoring solar radiation there is an email advisory sent out by NOAA in the US. There is also some excellent educational info on their website.
If your airline isn't monitoring solar radiation there is an email advisory sent out by NOAA in the US. There is also some excellent educational info on their website.
1) How are flights o the polar routes going to cope or deal with this
if the solar discharge takes only about 8 minutes to reach the earth's
atmosphere?
if the solar discharge takes only about 8 minutes to reach the earth's
atmosphere?
Solar flare - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The radiation hazard to polar aviation isn't required to be monitored for crew, but most airlines run regular programs to check for crew radiation. My airline tracks radiation exposure through their rostering system, and the roster each month has a dosage prediction at the bottom (which is always well below limits). Having said that, the prediction runs on average not real time, data.
A study by Mertens of polar flights during a solar storm in 2003 showed that passengers received about 12 percent of the annual radiation limit recommended by the International Committee on Radiological Protection. The exposures were greater than on typical flights at lower latitudes, and confirmed concerns about commercial flights using polar routes.
While the flights studied appear to have not put passengers in danger of exceeding the safe radiation limit on an individual flight, concerns remain, Mertens said. Many workers whose jobs expose them to consistent radiation sources log that exposure to keep a record over one's career. This is not the case for commercial aircrew, which receive the highest radiation levels of any occupationally exposed group.
People who work on commercial airline flights are technically listed as "radiation workers" by the federal government – a classification that includes nuclear plant workers and X-ray technicians. But unlike some others in that category, flight crews do not quantify the radiation they are exposed to.
While the flights studied appear to have not put passengers in danger of exceeding the safe radiation limit on an individual flight, concerns remain, Mertens said. Many workers whose jobs expose them to consistent radiation sources log that exposure to keep a record over one's career. This is not the case for commercial aircrew, which receive the highest radiation levels of any occupationally exposed group.
People who work on commercial airline flights are technically listed as "radiation workers" by the federal government – a classification that includes nuclear plant workers and X-ray technicians. But unlike some others in that category, flight crews do not quantify the radiation they are exposed to.
If you want a bit more information, my previous airline's company doctor produced the following paper on crew radiation exposure (admittedly for Australian conditions), and the limits:
http://www.pprune.org/pub/gen/radiation.htm
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Eyjafjallajokull
Age: 36
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only protons?
Light takes 8 minutes, travelling at the speed of. Protons, having mass, wander along at a lower speed
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
if recent findings are to be believed, there are electromagnetic radiation which can exceed the speed of light