Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737NG moderate rain

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737NG moderate rain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd November 2011 | 01:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
737NG moderate rain

Hi folks, Vol 1 says this;


If moderate to heavy rain, hail or sleet is encountered:
ENGINE START switches ....................................................... CONT
Autothrottle ............................................................ ............ Disengage
Thrust Levers ............................................................ ... Adjust Slowly
If thrust changes are necessary, move the thrust levers slowly.
Avoid changing thrust lever direction until engines have
stabilised at a selected setting. Maintain an increased minimum
thrust setting.
IAS/MACH .......................................................... Use a slower speed
Using a slower speed improves engine tolerance to heavy
precipitation intake.
Consider starting the APU (if available).
My questions to you are,
"How often do you see this proceedure being followed in moderate to heavy rain?"
and,
" Can anyone recall an instance of a CFM56 flaming out due water ingestion?"

Cheers, Framer
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2011 | 02:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: LHR
Several instances... please feel free to use google.

TACA Flight 110 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Im an Airbus guy but use the ignition fairly regularly in winter if there is yellow on radar, heavy rain or any standing water. It's free -and the only downside is a reduction in the ignition system lifespan
HPbleed is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd November 2011 | 03:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
From the wiki article,
The investigation concluded that the engines had failed "as a result of an inflight encounter with an area of very heavy rain and hail. A contributing cause of the incident was the inadequate design of the engines and that the FAA's water ingestion certification standards did not reflect the waterfall rates that can be expected in moderate or higher intensity thunderstorms."[2]
Thanks HP Bleed, They actually selected ignition on prior to entering by the sounds of it. It also seems that it was pretty severe TS with hail and probably heavy rain.
Any more examples anyone?

please feel free to use google.
Thanks Captain Bleed
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2011 | 01:41
  #4 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: America
I would definetly turn the A/T OFF. I've seen the throttles go to idle in level flight while on heavy rain and turbulence (probably due to sudden overspeed due to a gust). Reaction time while manually moving the throttles forward was unusually slow. Not something I would like to see again.
Don Gato is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2011 | 02:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Any more examples anyone?
I believe there was one in Greece before TACA.

Of course we don't need any more after learning our lesson in the TACA investigation.

Lots of changes have been made in the engines since then.

The awakening was to learn that low fan speed and high aircraft speed cause the water to not get centrifuged out the fan ducts (away from the burner). Of course the mass of hail in the mix also goes right through the fan and into the core like a miniture golf course golf ball through a windmill.

Keep the aircraft speed down (it's gusty as hell anyway) and the fan rpm up a tad. Meanwhile the engine guys can put in spinners and splitters behind the fan like an olympic ski jump to coax the stuff to deflect out through the fan duct.

lots of other selective things can be done as well depending on the installation and the intended use (S-ducts, bleeds, FADECs etc.)
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 24th November 2011 | 05:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 35
From: I wouldn't know.
Garuda 421 fits into the category. They had a dual flameout shortly close or within a thunderstorm, ditched the aircraft in a river, only one fatality.
Denti is offline  
Reply
Old 26th November 2011 | 08:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
From: Betwixt and between
Interesting questions Framer.

What is moderate or even severe rain compared to light rain? I suspect I have never encountered severe precip, and only anything approaching moderate rain at lower levels on approach when there is not a lot you can do about the speed during deceleration and the thrust levers are usually around idle anyway except for the odd level off.

As a result, I have never seen the full procedure implemented, only ever the start switches to CONT.
Sciolistes is offline  
Reply
Old 26th November 2011 | 13:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
What is moderate or even severe rain compared to light rain
Imagine flying into a waterfall for several seconds

If you hear the rat-a-tat-tat of hail on the nose dome or windshield you are already too far into it.

Agree that you probably can't thottle back any furthur than the FADEC will allow, but that is one of the fixes the manufacturers have put in.

As for aircraft speed, if you want it to be higher by all means do it with thrust, because high AC speed and low engine RPM are definitely the wrong way to go in this soup
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th November 2011 | 19:22
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
Wow there's some great info there, thanks a lot.
The reason I initially put the post up is that I often see descents at maybe 300kts in what I would consider moderate rain with engines at idle.
I guess at the end of the day it comes down to your own personal definition of 'moderate rain'.
I agree with HPBleed that ignition is free.
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 27th November 2011 | 16:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
"Keep the aircraft speed down (it's gusty as hell anyway) and the fan rpm up a tad."

Interesting conundrum
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th November 2011 | 17:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Keep the aircraft speed down (it's gusty as hell anyway) and the fan rpm up a tad."

Interesting conundrum
Agree

That's why we have FADECs today

Yes they can be a pain when you're trying to go nice and slow on a descent .. but we do need rain protection in some circumstances.

Similar problem on taxiways when you have to periodically spool up the fan to 60% in near freezing precip/snow.
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.