Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 CL Single Engine Range


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 CL Single Engine Range

Old 31st August 2011 | 22:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Europe
737 CL Single Engine Range

Fellow Aviators,

Having trouble finding SE Range for the 400.

Can someone point me in the right direction please.

BEst Regards.
Alltheway is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2011 | 15:04
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
It would help if you told us what you think 'SE Range' means?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2011 | 15:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Above & Beyond
BOAC, I seen you have covered a similar topic before back in 2006
Does the SE distance to an airfield change with operator or is it stated in JAR-OPS?

Using the tables Ive calculated 360nm but I remember a captain getting 344nm.
punk666 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st September 2011 | 16:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
BIG assumption, but if the 'q' is about distance from an alternate, this may answer the query. In EU land each company is required to specify a 'S.Eng cruise speed' and that determines the distance for the 1 hour limit. EU-OPS applies. ATW merely needs to look in his/her ops manuals (if he/she has any!) and the 'difficult' question will be magically solved.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2011 | 16:14
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Thanks for the useful info.

SE Cruise Range policy for me would be to firstly follow the SE Drift down procedure and then select FMC SE LRC Speed and manually plug into the MCP.

I note on the NG this is specified as 344nm but on the Classic FCOM the tables are a little eroneous.

I'll go for 344 as a distance to alternate. Thanks Guys.
Alltheway is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2011 | 18:47
  #6 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I suspect you are a little confused.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2011 | 20:39
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
From: Netherlands
BOAC is right, you are a little confused! Your part A will specify a single engine range for PLANNING purposes, it will also say zero wind conditions, once again for planning purposes. My manual says for the 73cl 360 miles and for the 73ng 370 miles. What you do enroute, during actual flight, may be completely different!

To many scenarios to discuss briefly here!

Listen to the old dinosaur though, usually he's right :-)
flyburg is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2011 | 04:36
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Europe
SE Cruise Range

My question was simply relating to the actual range available in the SE Scenario.

As stated I'd follow Boeings Drift down and FMC LRC so my FOM PArt A doesn't come into the equation.

Full respect to anyone with a wealth of experience and knowledge but i'm failing to see this from forementioned poster.

I'm satisfied with the tables.
Alltheway is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2011 | 07:21
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 35
From: I wouldn't know.
Don't understand the question then. Actual OEI case in flight, simply use the tables provided in your QRH, they are pretty easy to understand and there should be no confusion at all.

Planning or dispatch considerations as for example a take off alternate if you still happen to need one (none needed in a fail operational 737) should be found in your OM A.
Denti is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2011 | 07:35
  #10 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Originally Posted by atw
I note on the NG this is specified as 344nm but on the Classic FCOM the tables are a little eroneous.
- this is where you appear to be 'confused' and are confusing us. 344nm/whatever has very little to do with drift down or QRP/H (or 'speed' - it is a distance!) and a lot to do with your company published 'regulatory' s/e speed. I think you would do best to ask a pilot who knows what he is talking about in your company? What is it in Denti's post that does not work for you?

Luv from the dino

Edit to add:: This should all have been covered in your training? Why wasn't it?

Last edited by BOAC; 6th September 2011 at 08:09.
BOAC is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.