Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Max ALT for gear extension

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Max ALT for gear extension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2011, 08:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 40
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max ALT for gear extension

Hello,

On my a/c there is the following limitation:
Code:
Maximum altitude at which the landing gear may be extended ....... 21000 feet
Does anyone has an (aerodynamic) explanation why this limitation only concerns gear extension and not gear retraction?

Has it to do with compressibility, hence airspeed (EAS) limited?

Thanks a lot.
zonnair is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could read that statement in another way.

'The maximum altitude at which the gear may be down : 21000ft'
Cough is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Type? Often a 'limitation' produced by the highest 'tested' or 'demonstrated' event during certification, as with the 737 flap altitude limitation of 20,000'
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 564
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Flap altitude limitation is normally due to local airflow becoming supersonic.

Classic example was a Trident one in the clacton hold at around fl250 when the second officer extended the droop - the aircraft lost somewhere around 5000 ft before they recovered! (captain in the loo)

Grey matter says the limit was 22000ft?
blind pew is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Finsbury Park
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think that you'd have a bit of trouble maintaining altitude due to drag at typical cruise alt with the gear down!

Also, if the max retraction speed was 230kts, let's say, then you might also find yourself very near the low speed buffet before you could get the gear back up, although the drag penalty would get you back there much quicker than you'd think!

That's assuming the gear is operating normally. If it is locked down due to unserviceability, then you'd look at the gear down cruise tables in the ops manual to see how high you can climb.
Alycidon is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330? There's a maximum altitude chart on FCOM 2.04.25 P3, which gives, for a flight with gear extended, the maximum altitude "In order to ensure that there is at any moment of the flight a minimum range of 20 kts between VLS and the maximum speed (limited by thrust or VMO/MMO), the aircraft must remain below the following profile."

21,000 ft corresponds to 210t. So that's likely chosen as a safe assumption, if you took off at MTOW and started climbing with the gear down.
catiamonkey is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 11:23
  #7 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flap altitude limitation is normally due to local airflow becoming supersonic.
- Hmm. I think you'd be pushed to get a shockwave at 210kts at 20,000ft!
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 11:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might be surprised. Accelerating flow around regions of high curvature of aerofoils can become locally supersonic at VERY low freestream speeds. So while I'm not saying locally supersonic flow is the reason for a flap altitude limitation, I wouldn't rule it out based on the freestream data alone.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 11:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Set flap 1+F at F200 in the 320 sim once when we had some
spare time left over.

For the hell of it set 390 in the window and allowed speed to
follow Vx increase as altitude increased while not allowing it
to exceed 1+F limit. Passing 330 we got some buffeting and
deduced it was Mach effect. We continued climbing when Vx
encroached on Vfe 1+F, still buffeting but more pronounced.

Didn't fall out of the sky and might've made 390 if the sim
time hadn't run out.

But its just a sim after all and probably doesn't have the necessary
algorithms to fully reproduce these effects correctly.
Slasher is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 11:53
  #10 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would put money on the certification issue with flap - gear is another matter vis a vis an emergency descent. When I asked here ages ago about the 737 flap limit the 'considered opinion' was certification boundaries, not Mach. As was pointed out, who in h***l would want to do it anyway, so why test it?.
BOAC is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 17:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Environmental effects may also come into play. Gears are probably designed and qualified to operate with certain temperature limits. A gear in a bay at FL410 may get cold, but it doesn't have to do anything. But a deployed gear may have to be retracted, and if the hydraulics aren't intended to operate at the prevailing temps it may not work as advertised.

Certainly on some products the flaps and gear are qualified to an operational envelope which assumes low altitude use and so limits the low end of the temp scale.

Just a thought ...
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 22:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 40
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This limit is for extension (VLO extension)only. It's allowed to fly above this altitude with gear down as per fcom 2.04.25 up to FL350. Retraction however is not limited to 21000'.

Flaps are limited not to be extendED 20000', so no difference between extension or retraction.

It's indeed an A330.

Thanks again!
zonnair is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2011, 08:06
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 564
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
BOAC - the equation was fl 250, speed just below 250 knots indicated and leading edge droop - Trident 1 - fowler flaps - which was a bodge that was done away with on the 2 and 3.
blind pew is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.