747-400 Fuel Plan
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
747-400 Fuel Plan
Hi folks,
Could any kind soul here give me a rough idea of the fuel plan for a B747-400 flying from HKG to LDN please? Contingency, taxi, etc... and the likely differences for the return leg?
Also, I am looking for information on the fire extinguishing systems for the -400 please. If anyone can offer some salient points I would be very grateful.
Many thanks!
VFE.
PS: Have done a search but couldn't find what I was loooking for.
Could any kind soul here give me a rough idea of the fuel plan for a B747-400 flying from HKG to LDN please? Contingency, taxi, etc... and the likely differences for the return leg?
Also, I am looking for information on the fire extinguishing systems for the -400 please. If anyone can offer some salient points I would be very grateful.
Many thanks!
VFE.
PS: Have done a search but couldn't find what I was loooking for.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lamidanda (LDN) Nepal?
*There are two fire extinguisher bottles in each wing for the two engines on that wing, one or both bottles can be discharged in either engine on a wing.
*There is one APU fire extinguisher bottle controlled by the APU Fire switch.
*There are four fire extinguisher bottles for the forward and aft cargo
compartments. Pushing the Cargo Fire Discharge switch discharges two bottles immediately. The other two bottles discharge after a brief delay, or upon touchdown.
Are you looking anything more specific than that?
Also, I am looking for information on the fire extinguishing systems for the -400 please
*There is one APU fire extinguisher bottle controlled by the APU Fire switch.
*There are four fire extinguisher bottles for the forward and aft cargo
compartments. Pushing the Cargo Fire Discharge switch discharges two bottles immediately. The other two bottles discharge after a brief delay, or upon touchdown.
Are you looking anything more specific than that?
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is great thanks Mercenary Pilot! Just one other (possibly silly) question: Is it possible to crossfeed fire extinguisher contents from one wing to the other?
Thanks again,
VFE.
Thanks again,
VFE.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No it's not possible to crossfeed the extinguishers from one wing to the other. It's 2 bottles per wing but just pulling the handle out will close the related engine & spar fuel valves, the bleed valve, trip off the related engine generator, shut off hydraulic fluid and depressurise the engine-driven hydraulic pump so hopefully that would be all the fires 'fuel' and ignition sources removed.
For fuel burn, a rough estimate is 10 ton per hour with taxi burn of 1500kg per 10 mins. HKG-LDN (Nepal) is GC distance of 1750 so a 744 at LRC should do that in just over 3.5 hours, so add a little for airways and departure from HKG and I think the fuel required would be in the ballpark of 40,000KG plus normal reserves.
For fuel burn, a rough estimate is 10 ton per hour with taxi burn of 1500kg per 10 mins. HKG-LDN (Nepal) is GC distance of 1750 so a 744 at LRC should do that in just over 3.5 hours, so add a little for airways and departure from HKG and I think the fuel required would be in the ballpark of 40,000KG plus normal reserves.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is great thanks MP! Must confess I meant LHR not LDN, d'oh!
If you had to list them, what operational reasons make the 744 a better aircraft than a 777-300ER? Obviously the 744 can carry more pax but specifically, would there be any operational advantages from the RB211-524HT over the GE90-115 or anything else blindingly obvious which I cannot spot that would give the 744 the edge in a popularity contest?
Thanks again,
VFE.
If you had to list them, what operational reasons make the 744 a better aircraft than a 777-300ER? Obviously the 744 can carry more pax but specifically, would there be any operational advantages from the RB211-524HT over the GE90-115 or anything else blindingly obvious which I cannot spot that would give the 744 the edge in a popularity contest?
Thanks again,
VFE.
It's 2 bottles per wing
what operational reasons make the 744 a better aircraft than a 777-300ER?
Whatever your preference they're both top aircraft.
Last edited by wiggy; 6th Jun 2011 at 15:27.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought here, but 1500KG for 10mins taxi seems a lot....
How long would one expect to be held/taxiing for at peak time in HKG as a matter of interest?
Thanks again,
VFE.
How long would one expect to be held/taxiing for at peak time in HKG as a matter of interest?
Thanks again,
VFE.
1500KG for 10mins taxi seems a lot
Seem to recall that the rule of thumb for the 744 was about 4 tonnes an hour (roughly) for taxi...any other takers?
FWIW 10-11 tonnes per hour over the whole flight is about right.
Last edited by wiggy; 6th Jun 2011 at 15:29.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HKG-LHR, GC distance of 6000nm, flying East to West so I'll use a headwind of lets say 60kts average, take-off mass of 380,000Kg, using LRC with optimum step-climbs gives me a burn of 145,000kg and just under 14 hours flight time.
I'm sure someone who flies this route often will know much more accurate figures using their Econ speeds, known average winds and actual ground distance etc but I did my calculation straight from the 744 Perf manual so hopefully its in the park.
As a Pax aircraft its hard to list many reasons nowadays due to extended ETOPS routes allowed on the 777 and its ability to lift almost the same numbers but burn around 30% less fuel so I'm told. Also the old advantages of not having to turn back or divert after an engine failure are becoming mute as I understand many companies SOP's these days advise their jumbo crews to divert even though the 744 is more than able to safely continue on 3 engines with no loss of capability other than a reduction in cruise level and range.
From what I understand the purchase price of second hand 777 equipment is still high so some airlines are unable to replace them for the time being but as the fuel prices and competition increase the more the 777 becomes a necessity and the more the 744 will be converted to freighters, and there is actually a very strong demand for said 744 conversions at the moment as it is fantastic in this role.
I'm sure someone who flies this route often will know much more accurate figures using their Econ speeds, known average winds and actual ground distance etc but I did my calculation straight from the 744 Perf manual so hopefully its in the park.
If you had to list them, what operational reasons make the 744 a better aircraft than a 777-300ER?
From what I understand the purchase price of second hand 777 equipment is still high so some airlines are unable to replace them for the time being but as the fuel prices and competition increase the more the 777 becomes a necessity and the more the 744 will be converted to freighters, and there is actually a very strong demand for said 744 conversions at the moment as it is fantastic in this role.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't realise that a two bottles per wing option existed on the 744.....
How long would one expect to be held/taxiing for at peak time in HKG as a matter of interest?
1500KG for 10mins taxi seems a lot
Hi VFE,
Yesterday's HKG LHR flight (with RB211 engines) was into an abnormally weak headwind of only 4kts average, so these figures are unusual:
TOW 358000kg
Trip fuel 120000kg 12.00hrs 5550nm
Cont 800 kg 0.05min
Div 3800kg 0.20min 80nm
Res 4100kg 30min
Taxi 1200kg 25 min
TOTAL 129900kg
As far as fire extinguishers are concerned, the RR engines have 2 extinguishers per engine and the GE engines have 2 extinguishers per wing.
On the RR, you cannot cross-feed any engine's extinguisher into another one on the same wing, let alone across the wing. But as they have two each, I guess it was considered unneccessary.
On the GE engines either of the two bottles can be fired into either engine on the same wing, but you cannot cross-feed across to the other wing.
Don't know about PW engines.
Ball-park fuel flow for RR at heavy weight is 12000kg per hour initially, then after 12 hours it's down to about 8000kg. Taxi fuel is 2800kg per hour.
Hope this helps.
Eck
Yesterday's HKG LHR flight (with RB211 engines) was into an abnormally weak headwind of only 4kts average, so these figures are unusual:
TOW 358000kg
Trip fuel 120000kg 12.00hrs 5550nm
Cont 800 kg 0.05min
Div 3800kg 0.20min 80nm
Res 4100kg 30min
Taxi 1200kg 25 min
TOTAL 129900kg
As far as fire extinguishers are concerned, the RR engines have 2 extinguishers per engine and the GE engines have 2 extinguishers per wing.
On the RR, you cannot cross-feed any engine's extinguisher into another one on the same wing, let alone across the wing. But as they have two each, I guess it was considered unneccessary.
On the GE engines either of the two bottles can be fired into either engine on the same wing, but you cannot cross-feed across to the other wing.
Don't know about PW engines.
Ball-park fuel flow for RR at heavy weight is 12000kg per hour initially, then after 12 hours it's down to about 8000kg. Taxi fuel is 2800kg per hour.
Hope this helps.
Eck
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't know about PW engines.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you Eckhard, Mercenary Pilot and Wiggy!
Very helpful of you all - muchly appreciated.
VFE.
Very helpful of you all - muchly appreciated.
VFE.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The RR bottles are in the inlet nacelle of each engine, while with the P&W & GE engines the two much bigger bottles are in the wing LE inboard of pylons 2 & 3.
Edit: Apparently nacelle wasnt specific enough.
Edit: Apparently nacelle wasnt specific enough.
Last edited by SMOC; 7th Jun 2011 at 11:35.
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys, very useful. A couple more starters for ten...
1) What is the PSI of the (TE) flaps hydraulic system?
2) Are the LE flaps still pneumatic?
3) What is the air composition of the tyres?
4) Compared to the 777, does the 747 have greater redundancy in the flying controls following single and double hydraulic failure?
Many thanks again.
1) What is the PSI of the (TE) flaps hydraulic system?
2) Are the LE flaps still pneumatic?
3) What is the air composition of the tyres?
4) Compared to the 777, does the 747 have greater redundancy in the flying controls following single and double hydraulic failure?
Many thanks again.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: エリア88
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) What is the PSI of the (TE) flaps hydraulic system?
2) Are the LE flaps still pneumatic?
3) What is the air composition of the tyres?
4) Compared to the 777, does the 747 have greater redundancy in the flying controls following single and double hydraulic failure?
Dancing with the devil, going with the flow... it's all a game to me.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: England
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks MP!
Can anyone clarify the hydraulics reduncancy available on the 777 please? And whether the tyres are filled with 100% nitrogen on the 744?
Thanks,
VFE.
Can anyone clarify the hydraulics reduncancy available on the 777 please? And whether the tyres are filled with 100% nitrogen on the 744?
Thanks,
VFE.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ˙ǝqɐq ǝɯ ʇ,uıɐ ʇɐɥʇ 'sɔıʇɐqoɹǝɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɯɐu ɹıǝɥʇ ʇnd ǝɯos
Age: 45
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The other part of the fuel plan
What is the order of fuel use on a long-haul flight and the theory behind the aerodynamics?
I know that using the fuel from the tail first or last is supposed to be of aerodynamic benefit but I cannot remember which way it goes and why. I have looked it up in the books I have here at home but I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
Thanks in advance,
FRQ CB
I know that using the fuel from the tail first or last is supposed to be of aerodynamic benefit but I cannot remember which way it goes and why. I have looked it up in the books I have here at home but I was hoping for a bit more of an explanation.
Thanks in advance,
FRQ CB