Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Regulations for foreign aircraft within EASA territory

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Regulations for foreign aircraft within EASA territory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Feb 2011, 09:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Netherlands
Age: 34
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regulations for foreign aircraft within EASA territory

Hello everybody,

I know that every European airline has to meet the requirements set by EASA, like EU-ops for operational requirements. Now I was wondering how foreign airlines must operate within EASA territory, for example a random airline from lets say the United Arab Emirates. Let's say this airline meet the requirements of the local CAA, which is ICAO based. When this random airline has a destination within Europe, what are the requirements in this case and how do they have to fulfill these?

I know EASA has a safety assement on foreign aircraft (SAFA program), but yet I dont have an idea of the requirements. Are there for this situations any differences relative to the FAA regulations?

I hope someone can answer my questions.

Best regards,
T-mo-T is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 14:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada / Switzerland
Posts: 521
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To the best of my knowledge, a foreign airline is obliged to comply with the regulations of their state of registry (or state from which the AOC is issued), but is not 'a priori' required to comply with operating regulations of the state to which they are flying, with obvious exceptions for things like altimeter setting procedures and so forth.

Most countries (Europe, North America, etc.) keep an eye on the safety standards of foreign carriers through observation - notably ramp visits - and will take action on an exceptional basis if concerns are found.

Michael
V1... Ooops is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 14:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most countries (Europe, North America, etc.) keep an eye on the safety standards of foreign carriers through observation - notably ramp visits - and will take action on an exceptional basis if concerns are found.
Indeed so...other countries as well.
Recently, we had our aircraft inspected in both Argentina and South Africa.
Aircraft documents/technical log/DD log/safety equipment/pilots licenses, etc were all closely inspected, and approved.
Took about thirty minutes.
All inspectors went away pleased.
411A is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 16:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tomsk, Russia
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Addressed here, http://www.pprune.org/6209381-post6.html
selfin is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 17:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Netherlands
Age: 34
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay that makes sense. So this is because of the Chicago convention, to make sure that member countries can operate in each country? And the local CAA's can do their own inspections to determine wheter foreign operators are approved?

Now another question that follows from this. EASA has a list of approved foreign Part 145 organizations. Now the question; do foreign aircraft have to be maintained by an approved (foreign) Part 145 organization in order to be allowed to fly to EASA territory, or is a maintenance record done by an maintenance facility that is approved by a foreign CAA (let's say the United Arab CAA) also allowed?

Thanks for your replies!
T-mo-T is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 20:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada / Switzerland
Posts: 521
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think that the above question (about maintenance organization approval) is kind of academic, because any AMO operating within Europe would most probably be JAR 145 approved.

But, let's say there was an AMO in Europe that only had (for example) a Canadian approval - it could certainly look after and return to service any Canadian aircraft that happened to visit it, and this would be fully compliant with the rules.

Michael
V1... Ooops is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2011, 20:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But, let's say there was an AMO in Europe that only had (for example) a Canadian approval - it could certainly look after and return to service any Canadian aircraft that happened to visit it, and this would be fully compliant with the rules.
In one word...Yes.

Having said this I would then ask... AirFrance seems to get a complete pass, regardless of their many accidents/incidents, in the recent past.

IE: Double standard...anyone?
Hello?
411A is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2011, 09:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 76
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...AirFrance seems to get a complete pass..
Proof ? Hints ?

Or is this just another biased statement ?
DJ77 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.