Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Toe-in/toe-out

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Toe-in/toe-out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2011, 19:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 65
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Toe-in/toe-out

Are any tailwheel configured aircraft fitted with their mains with any degree of toe-in or toe-out? I am aware of the Goodyear-type installations on Stinsons (and perhaps even some early Cessnas) and the larger cargo carrying military types. Thanks in advance.
osmosis is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2011, 03:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toe in for the Cessna 180, toe out makes the aircraft a b*gger to land.
c100driver is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2011, 03:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 65
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have some time in the 180 series of tail wheelers and I am aware they can catch the unwary. Recent discussion and my own inquisitiveness has led me to search for toe-in/toe-out configuration but the information I have found to date seems to conflict.
osmosis is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2011, 07:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The service manual for the C180 and C185 have both the same instructions

Cabin and fuel tanks empty the toe in and positive camber should be.

Toe in 0" to .12"
Positive camber 4 to 6 degrees

This should give zero toe in and zero positive camber at max takeoff weight. therefore the landing will be with toe in in and positive camber after burning fuel.
c100driver is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2011, 09:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would reckon the 450HP Ag-cat, and the Cessna Ag-Wagon have a lot of toe-in. Both tend to "skip" when landing on sealed runways. IE the spring steel undercarrage comes in and then springs back out. Nothing to do with me surely?
Air Tourer is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2011, 21:33
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 65
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you c100 it was specifics I was looking for. But the confusing thing was other alleged information I have recently dug up cites toe-out also, though not for the 180/185.

Airtourer, the 188's had legs that dangled like a lovesick stork and we habitually used the grass when landing, bitumen on t/o.
osmosis is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2011, 01:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definitely toe-in.
EW73 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2011, 02:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South
Posts: 638
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I bought my C180 it was a real bit*h to land and had you sweating every time you looked at the tarmac. I flew it for years that way before I did a refurb on the landing gear and re rigged it. The difference was astounding, she turned into a pussycat and it was only my fault for the landings after then.
c100driver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.