Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737ng Nav Data Out Of Date

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737ng Nav Data Out Of Date

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jan 2011, 16:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: shanghai
Age: 42
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737ng Nav Data Out Of Date

if one day you have a nav data out of date problem on the fmc, and cannot be updated ,cause it isn`t in the company base ,no data disk out there.
the aircraft still can be released by the mel.
and during flight in the rvsm airspace, the atc request the crew to excute the offset to the right 5 miles, myquestion is: can the crew comply with the atc`s instructions?
can someone shed some light on me ? very appreciated!
citizensun is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 19:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While deferred the nav data is still functional, just out of date. I would say yes, and there is a 99.9% chance you are on course. Most updates are airport/terrain changes from what I am told.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 19:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think about it! if ATC request a 5ml offset, then they can see you, so what's this got to do with the Nav Database, of course you can comply.
Avenger is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 20:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was told that with the NAV database out of date, you could use it for enroute, but not for SID, STAR, and APP. If the MEL says it can be used for enroute NAV, offset should be fine.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2011, 22:56
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Besides, if it is not an operational restriction of your MEL you operate normal.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 06:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,129
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Are you really CERTAIN that you can operate under the IFR with an expired data base???

Not me pal!!

Think of the subsequent court of enquiry - for the lawyers BMWs all round and for the pilots ??????
mustafagander is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 08:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you really CERTAIN that you can operate under the IFR with an expired data base???
Absolutely for the Classic. MEL says not required as long as the operational procedure to verify the FMC route and monitor approach navaids is complied with.
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 09:10
  #8 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.and the NG - typically a 10 day limit. Not sure I'd operate an RNAV approach though!
BOAC is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 09:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you really CERTAIN that you can operate under the IFR with an expired data base???
Yep, permitted by the FAA Approved Minimum Equipment List.


Mutt
mutt is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 09:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOAC,
Not sure I'd operate an RNAV approach though!
I agree. With regard to your comment in another thread along the lines of exclaiming does everything need a rule! I suppose the problem is with so many rules, when an obvious one is missing somebody says, "it's legal, what's the problem?"

So yes, interesting that RNAV was omitted, but also departure navaids too.
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 10:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Think about it! if ATC request a 5ml offset, then they can see you, so what's this got to do with the Nav Database, of course you can comply.
Incorrect! There are a lot of places where a 737NG (or any other aircraft for that matter) could go where there is no radar cover, but you are in comms with an ATC unit!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 10:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess it depends in what kind of environment you operate. In europe for example the use of RNAV is required above a certain level (FL95 for most countries) and an out of date nav database is not approved for operation in that airspace.

Our 737 MEL has therefore an entry that allows all nav databases to be out of date only if there is no requirement for any RNAV procedure or navigation and of course as long as you have current charts on boards (charts are no longer required in dual FMC installation with EFB installed which may be inoperative as well). If you want to use any kind of RNAV procedures, no matter if enroute, approaches or departures, you need at least one current nav database on board and usable for the crewmember responsible for navigation.

You can allways try to file a non-RNAV flightplan, i had to use that once when our FMC forgot its database completely every time the aircraft was powered down. However that was a purely domestic flight and prior approval by any ATC unit in contact during our flight was necessary. On another occasion where we still had the FMC but the FMC-AP interface was gone we couldn't fly into switzerland as neighbouring country because they would not approve us without PRNAV, the aircraft was AOG until the problem was fixed.

To be honest i have never seen an out of date nav database in airline operation on the 737 so far, with good maintenance procedure and the possibility to pre-store the next database up to 27 days prior the date it becomes active it seems easy to keep them current.
Denti is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 14:17
  #13 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
denti:

Our 737 MEL has therefore an entry that allows all nav databases to be out of date only if there is no requirement for any RNAV procedure or navigation and of course as long as you have current charts on boards (charts are no longer required in dual FMC installation with EFB installed which may be inoperative as well). If you want to use any kind of RNAV procedures, no matter if enroute, approaches or departures, you need at least one current nav database on board and usable for the crewmember responsible for navigation.
You are authorized to fly instrument approach procedures without either paper or electronic (EFB) charts?

To be honest i have never seen an out of date nav database in airline operation on the 737 so far, with good maintenance procedure and the possibility to pre-store the next database up to 27 days prior the date it becomes active it seems easy to keep them current.
Major chart cycles are every 56 days with an interim update cycle, thus a database change every 28 days. It's not possible for database vendors to have a database ready 27 days before its effective date, at least not that I have seen. In my current work I receive a world wide nav database typically 14 to a maximum of 17 days before it becomes effective.
aterpster is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2011, 15:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are authorized to fly instrument approach procedures without either paper or electronic (EFB) charts?
Not on a routine basis, only if both EFB become u/s during a flight and under certain circumstances out of base, however in practical use that is impossible as all weight and balance as well as performance calculation is done on the EFB as well.

Major chart cycles are every 56 days with an interim update cycle, thus a database change every 28 days. It's not possible for database vendors to have a database ready 27 days before its effective date, at least not that I have seen. In my current work I receive a world wide nav database typically 14 to a maximum of 17 days before it becomes effective.
Yup, still more than enough time to distribute it even through a large fleet. Even more possible if you do not need a worldwide database and therefore get your update cycle even earlier.
Denti is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 09:37
  #15 (permalink)  
Nightrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To be honest i have never seen an out of date nav database in airline operation on the 737 so far, with good maintenance procedure and the possibility to pre-store the next database up to 27 days prior the date it becomes active it seems easy to keep them current.
Denti, you are a very lucky guy....there are many out there (including me) who have or still do see this on an often regular basis...
 
Old 15th Jan 2011, 10:55
  #16 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Including some who have operated for some days with NO database at all due to an eng dept cock-up
BOAC is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 14:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did that fairly recently. Just had to create all the waypoints, airports and navaids manually in the temporary nav database. Time consuming and error prone.
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2011, 14:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 Dispatch Deviations Guide
34-36-01-04 Navigation Databases
May be out of currency provided:
a. Current aeronautical charts are used to verify navigation fixes prior to
dispatch.
b. Procedures are established and used to verify status and suitability of
navigation facilities used to define route of flight.
c. Approach navigation radios are manually tuned and identified.

The original question was not about RNAV approachs etc, simply an offset, I still say yes!
Avenger is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.