Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

maximum V1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th October 2010 | 01:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: USA
Question maximum V1

cannot find information about : maximum V1, what is it. Thanks
cannotdrive55 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 02:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Changi
Hi,

To the best of my knowledge, if you have a indefinite runway length, the maximum V1 will be VMBE (Max tyre braking speed). Should the runway length be definite and limting, Max V1 will be calculated based on the stopping distance available.

Hope that helps,

Cheers
lion-g is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 02:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
It seems that lion-g beat me by a micro second, in Singapore we are early risers!

A few thoughts -

.1. V1 must not exceed Vr, but may be equal to it (the B727-200 is a good example),

.2. The maximum V1 used must (of course) allow for Accelerate-Stop within the available ASDA, and allow for continued acceleration to Vr and climb to 35' within the available TODA, both of these considerations being embodied within the 'total package' of Takeoff Performance requirements,

.3. The maximum V1 must consider Brake Energy Limits in the event of a rejected Takeoff (Vmbe),

.4. The Maximum V1 must consider tyre (tire for the Yanks) limit speed, although this will in the majority of cases be governed by Vr (Remembering that V1 may equal Vr).

There's plenty of other considerations for the LOWER limit of V1, not addressed here.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 07:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
And.... there is also a minimum V1. Some computerized performance programs give you both values, loved it.
hetfield is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 07:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: Europe
there is also a minimum V1.
Min V1 is not some fancy computer-calculated number, but mostly dependant on VMCG.

V1 has to be equal or higher than VMCG and equal or smaller than VR.
INNflight is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 09:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
Vmcg <= V1 <= Vr <= Vmbe / Vmo?
demomonkey is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 10:43
  #7 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 933
From: Den Haag
in Singapore we are early risers!
10:25 local - best you take an afternoon nap to recover!
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 11:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Min V1 is not some fancy computer-calculated number, but mostly dependant on VMCG.

V1 has to be equal or higher than VMCG and equal or smaller than VR.
Oversimplication Alert!!!!!!!!

V1min may be considerably higher than Vmcg in some cases.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 16:40
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
Originally Posted by demomonkey
Vmcg <= V1 <= Vr <= Vmbe / Vmo?
No. Partially correct.

V1 must be higher than Vmcg (actually must be higher than V1mcg, but the simpler statement is true too).

V1 must be lower than Vr, true.

V1 must also be lower than Vmbe, true.

Not sure what Vmo is doing in there, but sure, Vr must be lower than Vmo, I'll grant you that, though any aircraft where that is a consideration scheduling Vr is a strange beast indeed.

But there's no required relationship between Vr and Vmbe. If V1 were set equal to Vmbe, then Vr could easily be above Vmbe.

So I'd rewrite your relationships as:

Vmcg <= V1 <= Vr [ <= Vmo ]
and
V1 <= Vmbe

but really the Vmo bit is a red herring

lazy typing alert : add a bunch of "or equal to" statements to the text above. mea culpa
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 17:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Are we not playing with Vef today? Is he on the naughty step?

Vmcg<= Vef

V1= Vef + x where x is a time period defined by the certification standard.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2010 | 19:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
And V1 must not be less than the minimum speed at which we can recognize a critical engine failure, decide to go, and complete the take-off safely, with the critical engine inoperative, reaching V2 and screen height within the remaining TODA.

With a high take-off mass and a short TODA, this requirement may limit V1min, before it becomes low enough for V1<=VMCG to become the problem.
Keith.Williams. is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.