Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

conventional a/c

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

conventional a/c

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th July 2010 | 16:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Russia
conventional a/c

Hello! I really confused with the determination of "conventional aircraft" definition!
May be you have some thoughts?
pensador is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 16:46
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
Anything not Airbus
Slasher is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 16:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Russia
too narrow
pensador is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 17:03
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
B707 B727 B737 B747 B757 B767 B777 DC-1 DC-2 DC-3 DC-4 DC-5 DC-6 DC-7 DC-8 DC-9 DC10 MD11 L188 F27 F28 F70 PA28 PA31..... need I go on?
Slasher is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 17:14
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 278
Likes: 10
From: Europe
I would think it depends on the context: landing gear, canard vs. conventional, I could go on.
ant1 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 19:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
What about A300/310 ?
hetfield is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 19:22
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 509
Likes: 3
From: United States of Europe
When Airbus Industrie refer to 'conventional' aircraft they do so when discussing FBW handling qualities.
With 'conventional' they refer to all aircraft except FBW Airbus (A320 series and onwards)

Ciao
OPEN DES is offline  
Reply
Old 24th July 2010 | 19:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Conventional, means the little wheel is on the tail, where God meant it to be!
clunckdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2010 | 06:59
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
Amen Clunck. An old wise skipper told me yonks ago when I
was FOing DC3s for a short time "if you can master this bitch
accuratley and well you can fly anything the bastards throw
at you in the future."

Damn right!
Slasher is offline  
Reply
Old 25th July 2010 | 10:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Palmerston North
Tailwheel.
altmikey is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2010 | 04:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Ditto to the last 3 posts,

Conventional = Tail-wheel Undercarriage

Undoubtedly the every-day use of the word "conventional" will change over the course of time, but the definition remains unchanged.

I loved your post Slasher, 90% of what I know about flying aircraft was learned on DC3s.

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2010 | 04:38
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Formerly of Nam
This'll bring back memorys Smokey -




Of course you and me didnt have the modcons in this example but its still a 3!
Slasher is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2010 | 05:51
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 69
Likes: 6
From: On a survey line somewhere...
^^What Clunck and the others said. To me (started flying gliders at 16, though still a low time CPL at the moment flying a little conventional gear Pawnee and a glider), conventional=taildragger. Tricycle, well, tricycle.
sgs233a is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2010 | 06:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: England
Conventional to me means it has a seperate tailplane/horizontal stabilizer and that it's at the back.
cwatters is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2010 | 10:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Thanks for the memorys Slasher, and thanks for the tears.

Couldn't believe the mod-cons, but some things never change, counting the prop blades, hand signals for V2 above the million decibel noise level, etc. etc. etc. Circuit Breakers! It actually has circuit breakers, what demented person substituded circuit breakers for fuses!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2010 | 13:23
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 1,299
From: Australia
Thanks for the memorys Slasher, and thanks for the tears.
Conveniently forgetting of course that some of us (self) had more heart stopping moments like real engine failures in four years of flying big four-engine pistons than 15 years flying jets.. e.g for me over 30 engine failures in Rolls Royce Merlins in four years - versus nil engine failures in jet fighters or airliners over 15 years. Rose coloured lens and all that..
Centaurus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.