Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Starting the B787

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Starting the B787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2010, 09:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Starting the B787

I believe the B787 does not have a pneumatic system so how do they start it?
tubby linton is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 09:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Another fundamental architectural change on the 787 is the use of variable frequency electrical power and the integration of the engine generator and starter functions into a single unit."

boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_4_06/article_04_3.html
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 10:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From link above -
One of the primary functions of a conventional APU is driving a large pneumatic load compressor. Replacing the pneumatic load compressor with starter generators results in significantly improved start reliability and power availability.
I had to read this half a dozen times before it made any sense. Is this what they mean?

One of the primary functions of a conventional APU is driving a large pneumatic compressor. 787 engine start though electrical starter/generators allows elimination of the APU pneumatic compressor resulting in significantly improved main engine start reliability and APU (electrical) power availability.

Nope. Still not clear.
forget is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 10:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the primary functions of a conventional APU is driving a large pneumatic load compressor. Replacing the pneumatic load compressor with starter generators results in significantly improved start reliability and power availability.
My take: Old APUs drive a compressor. Ours doesn't. The new APU starts better and has better electrical availability.

Which component has better start and power availability is a little vague, actually.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 11:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Another fundamental architectural change on the 787 is the use of variable frequency electrical power and the integration of the engine generator and starter functions into a single unit."

boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_4_06/article_04_3.html
Great article , thanks for sharing. I hadn't realised they were going for electric actuators on the brakes too.
It'll be interesting to see if their reliability predictions come to fruition with the generators as previous experience with the VSCF proved it was worse than a conventional IDG setup.

Good on them though, I'm looking forward to these arriving so much more than the A380.
Fargoo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.