Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Max speed B767 at MSL

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Max speed B767 at MSL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd July 2010 | 08:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 1
From: Nowra, NSW, Australia
Max speed B767 at MSL

I've seen figures for a B767 cruise speed at altitude and max speed at altitude, but does anyone have a max (I suppose theoretical) speed for a B767 at sea level?

If not, what considerations come into the calculation of such a figure?

ta!
evilroy is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2010 | 08:19
  #2 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings

Check speed boats , hovercraft , power boat but an aircraft flying at sea level
 
Reply
Old 2nd July 2010 | 09:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
Above 250kts at sea level, the major concern would be windscreen integrity . . . in case you'd smack into a pelican, or seagull.
GlueBall is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2010 | 09:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: the pub
After a brief search - B767 vmo 360kts IAS.
one dot right is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2010 | 10:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
After a brief search - B767 vmo 360kts IAS.
Negative...the TCDS says 360KCAS/M.86
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2010 | 10:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: the pub
After the ADC it's the same.
one dot right is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2010 | 06:37
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 86
From: Planet Earth
360 /.86 are good numbers.


As an aside, it was calculated that one of the 767's that hit the WTC was indicating over 400 Knots..
stilton is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2010 | 20:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
What he aircraft is capable of, and what it is certified to do are two different things. I believe the FAA have a safety factor of 1.2 and the UK CAA 1.3. Thus early UK registered aircraft were limited to a lower speed. The implications of this was that the aircraft monitoring programs would throw up overspeed warnings even though the aircraft never exceeded the barber's pole. This would piss the pilots off, because they get 'bollocked' for an overspeed because they would rely on the information on the ASI, which was wrong. The problem that although the UKCAA certified to a lower limit the software was never changed, so the Barber's pole would read the FAA standard. Ultimately, with JAA ops. the situation was rectified in as much as the CAA fell into line with the other European states and the Boeing limit was accepted as the limit. Even though, we still had to 're-certify' the aircraft with the CAA and make the changes to the Flight manuals and ops manuals. The moral is that the speed is the barber's pole since this is automatically adjusted to Mach No. at the Mach/airspeed changeover, which in turn is dependant on outside air temperature. The limits in previous answers are Boeing, and are correct.
On-MarkBob is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2010 | 22:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: uk
To provide bird strike protection, do not exceed 313 KIAS below 8000 ft.

(Airplane Flight Manual)
mustbeaboeing is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.