AIRMET Legality
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AIRMET Legality
Trying to find out weather an AIRMET can leaglly bind you from flying.
Say you don't have a weather radar and the MEL states you can dispatch as long as you don't fly into areas of TS or other potential hazardous weather.The TAF doesn't state anything about CB's but the AIRMET does.
Legally (not what's the wisest thing to do)...can you depart?
Thanks!
Say you don't have a weather radar and the MEL states you can dispatch as long as you don't fly into areas of TS or other potential hazardous weather.The TAF doesn't state anything about CB's but the AIRMET does.
Legally (not what's the wisest thing to do)...can you depart?
Thanks!
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Indiana USA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure about your MEL, but the ones that I have been working with all say it about the same way...
current weather reports indicate that no thunderstorms or other potentially hazardous weather conditions that can be detected with airborne weather radar may reasonably be expected along the route to be flown.
That means to me as the dispatcher that I have to use ALL of my available tools to see if I can dispatch a WXRDR inop flight - of which an Airmet is one of the tools in my toolbox, along with Convective weather outlooks, lifted index/K index charts, you name it. If I have no convective weather at departure and arrival, but a nice cold front enroute blowing TS from one side of hell to the other, you bet your ass that I am looking at Plans B, C, all the way to cancelling if I cant route around it.
An AIRMET is a legal forecast, but just one piece of the puzzle...
