Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Engineers - any sign of ash damage so far?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Engineers - any sign of ash damage so far?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2010, 12:46
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

KUMOOZ, depends where you are I suppose, but we do them on all ours and those that we handle.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 12:48
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
There is a check c/o on every a/c after every flight, this check encompasses many things, it is issued or endorsed by the a/c manufacturer and the regulating authority. If you did or do it you will know.
Problem is that some airlines are fully endorsing the manufacturers recomendations and others are not.

Two spring to mind, no names etc.


Similar a/c type.

Airline 1. The check is drawn up by the airline's maint engineers and involves a separate check sheet. L/G doors open, flaps extended and a thorough inspection signed off in the tech log.
Airline 2. No extra paperwork, transit check unchanged, no communication from the airline's maint engineers regarding any extra detailed checks required.
TURIN is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 13:14
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 30W
Age: 56
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spanners,

RE-assuring to hear.....I flew 10 years with tcx and all transit checks outside of the UK (etops excepted) were always carried out by the flight crew..are you telling me tcx and other carriers are now having the aircraft checked by engineers each and every transit during the present times......at ZTH? DLM? PVK?................... really??????
KUMOOZ is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 15:52
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
l think he is not referring to your airline (TCX), only his own set up.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 16:05
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Airline no2, one that we probably used to do!!, not the best communicators, Pain In the Ar$e no doubt.

Sorry KUMOOZ CX not TCX.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 17:46
  #86 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by safewing
Does anyone know has the improvement in engine technology over the years diminished the risk of volcanic ash?
I was told yes the other day by a design engineer at Rolls Royce. What he told me is that because civil and military technology tend to shadow each other a lot, there was a lot done after the 1991 Gulf War lessons in engine resistance to sand, that has mapped to volcanic ash resistance in civil gas turbine engines.

He was senior and experienced enough that I'm inclined to believe he knew what he was talking about.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 18:16
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
Airline no2, one that we probably used to do!!, not the best communicators, Pain In the Ar$e no doubt.
Close, but no.

I'll say no more.
TURIN is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 19:32
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
safewing

Does anyone know has the improvement in engine technology over the years diminished the risk of volcanic ash?
The improvements in tolerance to rain-hail and/or ice would significantly improve the resistance to Volcanic ash.

However, the most significant improvement is knowledge of what to do if you enter volcanic ash and develop symptoms, i.e. cut back on the operating temperature until the symptoms clear.

It's like telling a a victim of a breathing problem and in a coughing fit from inhaling pollen, dust, etc., to take smaller breaths until the coughing subsides,

Once again, the safety issue is the individual event of entering a cloud and developing sysmptoms and a proper reaction.

The rest of the equation having to do with on-the-ground actions is a operator maintenance issue, which is more of the business that they know best how to address. Costly yes, but dispatching unsafe planes is not likely to be more than an umeasurable blip.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 20:37
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
My question is is it possible for contaminants i.e silicates to flow into the hot metal compressor blade materials during subsequent cooling thereby creating brittle points?

Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 4th May 2010, 22:16
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: EPWA
Age: 65
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
spannersatcx, TURIN:

simple SAFETY question:

why do not clearly state which airlines are too much relaxed on maintenance? i would make sure not to book my tickets with them! Those which follow the prescribed procedures surely deserve more pax to cover extra costs
WojtekSz is offline  
Old 10th May 2010, 16:19
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Ryanair fesses up - anyone else?

BBC News - Ryanair admits volcanic ash in Belfast engines

So, to all the naysayers this stuff does exist and it goes in the big round things that suck in tonnes of air and burns it up.

Note that Ryanair initially denied this entirely.

According to the report these aircraft had flown in airspace that was "open and unrestricted".

This made me chuckle: "The spokesman said Ryanair cannot explain why there was ash in the engines other than there are trace elements of it in the atmosphere." Well, duh! There's this honking great big volcano barfing up huge plumes of stuff - all along it has been stated that this stuff is not necessarily visible to be harmful.

I suspect this is the tip of the iceberg.

For now all I expect is a series of replies denying this is really a problem, etc.

I'm half expecting a "wrong-kind-of-air" excuse, bit like the "wrong-kind-of-leaves" excuse that British Rail use every few years or so, when all the trains stop running in Autumn.

- GY
GarageYears is offline  
Old 10th May 2010, 16:45
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: east of 10° west
Age: 62
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
right....

I suspect this is the tip of the iceberg.
you bet, and the show will not be over until the old lady ( or better said, that young juvenile delinquent volcano) stops singing..

it is the smallest tip of the iceberg..

but all airlines who advocated flying through that sh... so loudly are keeping silent...

why is that?

well they are so cash strapped and so badly managed and very soon they will need lots of money for unscheduled maintenance and "early overhauls"..

they will ask that money from the EU taxpayers...but not under the title of "engine maintenance", but lost biz due to that volcano etc etc etc..

so before we EU taxpayers will hand out tons of money to these clowns we should ask some smart beancounters to check these airlines' balance sheets...to find why they really need so much dough...

maybe hidden somewhere under "performance restoration" on the engine maintenance side of their books
falconer1 is offline  
Old 10th May 2010, 23:45
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm half expecting a "wrong-kind-of-air" excuse, bit like the "wrong-kind-of-leaves" excuse that British Rail use every few years or so,
Even more apposite was the Wrong Kind of Snow excuse, also by British Rail, when unexpectedly fine snow got drawn into the cooling system of some locos in northern England. The snow promptly melted and shorted out the electrical system. Ironically, we then have the MUCH more recent classic example of failure to read history - by Eurostar. You'll remember that various Eurostars stalled in the Channel Tunnel, when snow / ice that had got into the locos crossing France melted in the (warm) tunnel and, guess what?, shorted the electrics.

Clearly, volcanoes have been around for a while and VA has presumably been a (potential) problem for turbines since they took over from propellors! Quite shameful, really, that proper research and development effort starts only after a major incident.
brooksjg is offline  
Old 11th May 2010, 00:03
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
spannersatcx, TURIN:

simple SAFETY question:

why do not clearly state which airlines are too much relaxed on maintenance?
Because we want to keep our jobs.
TURIN is offline  
Old 21st May 2010, 14:57
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sunny Berkshire
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WSJ - BA: Found No Ash in Engines

BA has operated more than 20,000 flight segments and conducted more than 8,000 engine inspections, Mr. Walsh said. "Not only have we not found any damage from ash, we have not found any ash"
im1234 is offline  
Old 24th May 2010, 05:52
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Real, or Rumor?

I hesitate to post this one, as I receive so many emails with legit pix, but bogus stories about them.

"Here’s what happens to an engine when it's flown through a volcanic ash cloud. This is a Cessna Citation Jet (CJ2) out of Germany a few weeks ago. Luckily the other engine kept running, although very sluggishly***"


Following were several pix of an engine with uncontained failure, apparently N1 or N2 blades shed.


Sorry, I don't have a way to post the pix, nor inclination to find a public site to do it.

GB
Graybeard is offline  
Old 24th May 2010, 08:00
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hesitate to post this one
Pity you didn't extend the hestitation ad infinitum.
forget is offline  
Old 24th May 2010, 08:39
  #98 (permalink)  
PBL
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not ash

Graybeard,

the following short note from the NTSB, CEN10RA135 , says that an aircraft from Eisele Flugdienst GmbH, D-IEFA, suffered an uncontained "event" on March 1.

The citation came from forget (which citation I overlooked) and repeated by infrequentflyer789 on the R&N ash thread, in answer to my query.

I found two paint schemes from Eisele in pictures on the WWW, and one paint scheme fits the pictures I was inquiring about, to which you may also be referring. The registration in those pictures is a D-reg.

March 1 is before the volcanic ash started causing problems.

PBL
PBL is offline  
Old 24th May 2010, 10:00
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
Yup, it's a hoax email.

Snopes
TURIN is offline  
Old 24th May 2010, 13:36
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SoCalif
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, guys. Should have checked Snopes myself.

I still haven't figured out why people pull this crap. Just last week I received the one again about a guy from New York retiring in Portugal, and finding the large barn on his new farm was full of collector cars.

Hmm, looked like they could have been covered with volcanic ash...

GB
Graybeard is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.