Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Dual bleed fault A320

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Dual bleed fault A320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Apr 2010, 07:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dual bleed fault A320

I would like to know what ECAM shows if you're in the middle of a procedure for a single bleed fault and the other bleed fails. Does it wipe the existing single bleed procedure and just display Dual Bleed Fault? Or does it tag Dual Bleed Fault after the single bleed fault procedure? I imagine it's the former, but if someone could confirm... More importantly, how would I answer my own question with FCOM? I had a good look at it yesterday but could not come up with a definitive answer.

Cheers,

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 07:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Permafrost,
the ECAM message ENG 1 BLEED is automatically replaced by AIR ENG 1 2 (DUAL) BLEED FAULT: the relevant part on the FCOM is 3.02.36 p.3 !

Happy Landings,
fredgrav
fredgrav is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 08:36
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks fredgrav. I had found the relevant FCOM pages, but from what I could see it didn't tell you whether the ENG 1 BLEED message was automatically replaced by the AIR ENG 1 2 (DUAL) BLEED FAULT, or whether AIR ENG 1 2 (DUAL) BLEED FAULT was ADDED to after the ENG 1 BLEED message.

In other words, I was wondering whether you could end up in a situation where you didn't know whether to finish the ECAM procedure you had already started (ENG 1 BLEED) before going to the QRH to carry out the AIR ENG 1 2 (DUAL) BLEED FAULT paper procedure.

I'm still fairly new to the beast and, coming from a non-ECAM jet, I'm still a bit worried that I end up in situations where I don't know whether to follow ECAM or QRH.

Cheers

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 09:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eheheh, you're right Perma, it's a bit confusing to be honest !
Anyway it all comes with priority rules: Level 1-2-3. Whenever a second failure of this type happens while already perfoming an ECAM action, you can either HOLD ECAM and check with QRH/OEB's, or simply continue doing actions in the reported order (eg. new Level 3 warning over the old Level 2): should a DUAL ENG BLEED FAULT caution be displayed just after a 1/2 ENG BLEED FAULT, the right new ECAM sequence will automatically overcome the old one, belonging to a lower level.
The FCOM sections related to ECAM Sequence and Priority Rules are 1.31.10 and 1.31.25.

Hope that helps,
fredgrav
fredgrav is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 11:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So why have we just had a notification of new oeb/qrh procedure while airbus sort out the ecam procedures?
Nubboy is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 13:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 36
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Some FWC's, thus ECAM procedures have been updated with new OEB's, some not. A message "REFER TO QRH PROC" is displayed on the E/WD/STS page whatever there's a POB overriding the existing ECAM. In such a case, the use of QRH is mandatory. By the way, each time the crew has a good reason to believe that an ECAM procedure ain't the best action to cope with the failure, it is possible either to refer on QRH or do the best thing yourself (eg. ECAM instructs you to shutting off the last hydraulic system available).

fredgrav
fredgrav is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2010, 14:02
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1.31.10 and 1.31.25
Thanks, sometimes getting back to basics is just what you need! I really wish I had a paper copy of FCOM though...

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.