Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

'Last look' checks - for/against?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

'Last look' checks - for/against?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 02:45
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO, short finals or lining-up for departure are places to be looking out the window and concentrating on handling the aeroplane. Am I in a minority of one who feels that these impromptu self-created extra checks just get in the way?
I totally agree it is a bad idea to get distracted and start some kind of paranoid ad-hoc scan at a critical moment. All the killer items are part off the checklists, but checklists can fail to get done. I use two simple triggers. If the chart clip is flat against the control wheel the before takeoff checklist hasn't been completed. It takes but a nanosecond on receipt of a line up clearance. The second is at 1,000 RA, "CCG", Checks complete, Cleared to land, G/A altitude set. Works for any approach.
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 06:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"All" important checklist or flows is followed up by a bit of OCD.

I take great pleasure in spotting what it is the other driver is double-checking
True,- not everybody is doing it, however most are...
plain-plane is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 07:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Uh... Where was I?
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it is good airmanship, even in highly ergonomic cockpits such as the 320, with Take of and Landing Memos and the way the checklist are designed, so you check take off config well before the rush of the cleared for inmediate take off, or after a similar rush in short final.
Maybe one day the Memo has some important blue line pending and in the rush you miss it.
Both checklists and actions triggered by conditions or other actions can be missed by unexpected events, such as LOC failure or just an ATC ususual transmission or instruction. So the late checks are a good idea, and good airmanship in my opinion.

But this "home made" checks have to be made always. Specially when things are rushing. Otherwise they are quite useless, as the normal checks and call outs are enough.

As Framer says, keep it to yourselves, or every FO would have to learn each Captain's home made last checks. Please don't mumble nor say alound things about flaps, gear, spoilers in short final. It is distracting.

cheers
Microburst2002 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 07:20
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: motorway services
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please don't mumble nor say alound things about flaps, gear, spoilers in short final. It is distracting.
You have summed it up nicely. Personally I always ensure the vital things are there, silently! and I would never presume to suggest no-one else should.

However, there is nothing worse than half-hearing someone else's mantra as it may be done at a different time to your own and you find yourself thinking "yes thank-you the gear is still down, the spoilers are still armed" when you would prefer to be listening to the r/t...

In my original posting I was in fact referring to the muttering aloud brigade. As I am not qualified at mind-reading I have no idea how often my colleagues check and re-check the same items, nor do I care, just as long as I don't have to hear it.

Feel free to tell me if the gear isn't down yet though
strikemaster82 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 09:10
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Strikemaster, 'having to hear it' probably depends on whether you are the Capt or the F/O. As the Capt you could probably tell him to shut up, but this could be a CLM if you are the F/O. (CLM = career limiting move).
Agreed that there are some nonsensical statements and chants made in the cockpit. My pet hate with one bloke was - upon becoming visual -always said: 'for the threshold'. Where else were we headed? Another gripe is with those who make a lengthy speech about the status of the instruments when taxying - the old 'turning left skidding right, compasses decreasing' mantra. Another useless one is 'inbound, no flags'. I would rather hear a statement like 'established, descending to...' to give me comfort that we both agree about how low we can go. Talking about instrument status is hardly necessary with modern warning systems. But I'm gonna stick with 'landing flap 3 greens' and the poor old F/O is just gonna live with it.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 09:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do them on both line-up and short final, but silently. The distraction of the "mumbling checks" is made worse in today's international fight decks. Especially during crucial phases of flight, please stick to SOP calls! It can be very confusing otherwise.

Besides the usual flap/spoiler/trim/gear checks, I double check I'm on the runway! Compass check alone will not catch a taxiway lineup. What it will catch is lining up on a runway from distant intersection - facing the wrong way! I'm sure it's been done after weeks of prevailing winds and a sudden runway change...

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 11:16
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
But I'm gonna stick with 'landing flap 3 greens' and the poor old F/O is just gonna live with it.
Yes yes everyone knows that you're the Captain and you have power and authority and all that jazz, but jeez wayne....don't you care that you're annoying to fly with?

mumble mumble gear mumble flaps mumble green
framer is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 11:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it's what you do, don't change it.
Nothing wrong with a quick personal scan before take off and landing - bloody good idea.
Try to do it silently because, if it's non SOP, it may confuse the other crewmember or even interrupt THEIR little 'comfort check'.

I say again: If you have a little personal safety habit you've built up over years of safe flying, don't drop it - that habit may be why you haven't had an incident.
Basil is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 11:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone who hasn't been tired enought to screw up a check list hasn't lived. If one of these self created safety checks catches one item once then they are worth putting up with. And I'm not too proud to admit Ive seen it happen.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 14:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three times in the last year I have had a laser light shone at me during approach. On two of those occasions the distraction was enough to cause us to miss something. Luckily nothing major and subsequently corrected. I would advocate a (quiet) personal scan as good airmanship.
shortleg is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 15:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: England
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My opinion; great idea to do it, bad idea to say it out loud.
In a nutshell!
I find it somewhat distracting if an FO loudly runs through his particular pre-line up chant after putting away the before T.O. checklist, especially when it doesn't contain anything extra over what he has just finished reading out.

Fully agree that a quiet check of "the killers" is vital, and I will always pass on that advice.
John Boeman is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2010, 19:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
...Personally I always ensure the vital things are there, silently! and I would never presume to suggest no-one else should.
Agreed. Verbalising non-SOP checks at critical phases of flight can lead to confusion.

I remember on a previous type, one of the pre-takeoff checks was a challenge of "Flaps?" to which the response, under normal circumstances, would have been "Five" (say) and "Green" (all the LE deployed, otherwise "Red" = no go). Simple. But no: many had their own little mantra, all subtly different from the others. Sometimes it was verbal diarrhoea: "Five, green, five on the card, five in the box, five fingers on my hand, five is my number, here's a fiver...", etc. All a bit distracting, especially when mumbled into the headset in a busy ATC environment.

IMHO nothing wrong in saying, clearly, "I'm just going to check the config. before we go; don't mind me." or words to that effect. It stops you wasting time trying to understand WTF the other pilot is failing to communicate to you.
FullWings is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 20:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Scotland
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 years ago at 400 feet my light aircraft mnemonic checks done silently in my head saved me from landing with an incomplete landing checklist on a 70 ton jet. Our goof for not completing the checklist and getting distracted but the old habits closed the hole in the Swiss cheese. Non SOP but airmanship.


G-DAVE

I sympathise with your frustration. FinalS is a grammar cancer that has spread throughout an alarming amount of pilots.

Many people are now parking their aeroplanes (or should that be aircraftS)in a hangEr.

Is anyone willing to come up with an emoticon to show a revolver to one's own head?
Kiltie is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 20:37
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: AMSTERDAM
Age: 39
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 for 411A

Trim, Flaps, Spoilers. Very usefull and did safe my day once.

not only for the oldtimers
nbairlines is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 22:10
  #35 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always silently check flaps and trim before line up, and flaps and gear before landing.

To be honest I silently check a lot of things all through the flight because I was taught a long time ago that doing so would likely see me through to retirement in one piece.

So far so good - but too early to count my blessings.


Regards
Exeng

Last edited by exeng; 5th Mar 2010 at 06:24.
exeng is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 07:14
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ... on an island!
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B707 last check, with the F/E reading...

Before Takeoff (ALL)

- Transponder, Doppler and DMEs: DECLARE
- Cabin Notification: DECLARE
- Landing Lights: DECLARE
Engineer's Takeoff Checklist: COMPLETE
- Anti Skid: ON
- Speedbrake: FORWARD
- Stabilizer Trim: DECLARE
- Wing Flaps: (), INDICATE (), GREEN LIGHTS, IN DETENT
- Compassess: CHECKED
TAKEOFF CHECKLIST: COMPLETE
____________________________________

Landing Checklist (ALL)

- Speedbrake: FULL FORWARD IN DETENT
- Landing Gear: DOWN, 3 GREEN LIGHTS
- Wing Flaps: (), INDICATE (), GREEN LIGHTS IN DETENT
- Yaw Damper lights: OFF
Pilots' Approach Checklist: COMPLETE
- Antiskid: 4 RELEASES
- Engine Ignition: FLIGHT START
- Turbos: MAX TWO
- Hydaulic Pressure and Quantity: NORMAL
Engineer's Landing Checklist: COMPLETE
LANDING CHECKLIST: COMPLETE
____________________________________
169west is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 10:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B707 last check, with the F/E reading...
Not required or needed on the scarebus, we just push a few buttons and go.
NVpilot is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 12:31
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Not required or needed on the scarebus, we just push a few buttons and go."


Ahh yes. The result of 40 years of technological innovation culminating in the loss of the third set of eyes also known as the Second Officer.

Ain't progress great!!
boingdrvr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.