Antarctic pollution ?
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Antarctic pollution ?
I've just viewed some YouTube video of C130s operating from the Antarctic bases. One showed pax boarding whilst the a/c sat with engines running, spewing vast amounts of condensation/contrail which blew around. Given that we should be preserving these lands, just how much Jet A1 could there be in that exhaust and would it settle out on the surface ?
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Modern jet engines are VERY efficient and run with significant excess air available. There is VERY little, if any, unburned fuel in the exhaust. The condensation is water, so maybe they add back to the ice pack...
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Previous poster is correct.
At Amundsden-Scott polar station C130s do not power down in case engines cannot be restarted due to cold.
Believe it may be the same at Willys and Pegasus fields.
At Amundsden-Scott polar station C130s do not power down in case engines cannot be restarted due to cold.
Believe it may be the same at Willys and Pegasus fields.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: USA
It's a real concern for scientific experiments. Overall, the fuel burned at the station is insignificant compared to the rest of the world. Perhaps the bigger problem is the diesel generators that provide power for the base, those run 24/7.
There is a clean air sector for this reason, where science that relies on clean air is conducted. It's upwind from the station and aircraft overflights are prohibited. There's a similar dark sector too for light and radio, where astronomical experiments are conducted.
There is a clean air sector for this reason, where science that relies on clean air is conducted. It's upwind from the station and aircraft overflights are prohibited. There's a similar dark sector too for light and radio, where astronomical experiments are conducted.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: FL410
All you're seeing there is water - the engines will generally be throwing out the same amount of water wherever they are.
Contrary to public opinion, you can't normally see CO2 (it boils at -57degC). Reminds me of the picture published in the Telegraph not so long ago that showed a 747 in the cruise with 4 "trails of smoke and soot" coming from the engines as they put it.
Contrary to public opinion, you can't normally see CO2 (it boils at -57degC). Reminds me of the picture published in the Telegraph not so long ago that showed a 747 in the cruise with 4 "trails of smoke and soot" coming from the engines as they put it.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 3
From: Georgia, USA
I've just viewed some YouTube video of C130s operating from the Antarctic bases. One showed pax boarding whilst the a/c sat with engines running, spewing vast amounts of condensation/contrail which blew around. Given that we should be preserving these lands, just how much Jet A1 could there be in that exhaust and would it settle out on the surface ?
