Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why is the TA set at 18000 ft in the USA?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why is the TA set at 18000 ft in the USA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: here where I live
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is the TA set at 18000 ft in the USA?

Hi guys,

I often play with a Captain a quiz game with aeronautical questions. He ask me something and I have to find an answer, there is no time limit for that and we may use all the means available to get it (my Iphone was really useful during a transit ); and vice versa. Now, it's my turn to answer him, and the heading of this thread is the question:

Why is the TA set at 18000 ft in the USA?

(the only tip he gave me is that it's a technical reason)

Thank you mates

PS: I've never flown in the USA, he was an instructor in a flying club there..
JetMcQuack is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe it's due to the height of the mountains in the country.
For example, Holland is about as flat as an ironing board and the transition level is down around FL050 from memory.
In Papua new Guinea is about FL200 I think due to the large mountains. In Australia it's FL110 because we only have medium-sized rocks here.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Above & Beyond
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unlike Europe the US have things sorted and realised 18,000 feet will stop altitude busts haha.
punk666 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:33
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: here where I live
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've already tried that way, but he says it's not the right one (or the one he is thinking to be right )

We have in Italy TA as low as 4000 ft
JetMcQuack is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 21:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MOER
Age: 45
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
guarda qua chi ne parla...

Novita' interessante
Drex is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 22:30
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: here where I live
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok but, in this case, it's not just a "USA related" question.

That link shows different advantages of using a fixed TA in all over the world.

Maybe the Captain's question was not intended to be a USA only condition.
JetMcQuack is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2010, 22:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its to avoid the question, "Whats that mountain goat doing up here in the clouds?" followed by a sudden stop.
clunckdriver is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 00:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Age: 64
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instesting article about a common TA in Europe

http://www.eurocontrol.int/airspace/...erspective.pdf
slatch is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 02:33
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: on a beach
Age: 68
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JetMcQuack, it's not transition altitude, it is transition level because in the
U.S. it is FL180. The TA is 17.000 ft.
I guess it is because the americans are very practical and would rather change the atlimeter setting always at the same place and when you are less busy than down low and close to the ground.
beachbumflyer is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 03:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because when you are below FL180, you'll always be on a local QNH, thus ensuring no altimeter error with regard to terrain, MSA etc. (Not including temp correction).
helen-damnation is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 03:13
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's not transition altitude, it is transition level because in the
U.S. it is FL180. The TA is 17.000 ft

On all the USA Jepp charts I've ever seen it states that

Trans level: FL180 Trans alt: 18000'
with a proviso in the WWText that at certain low values of QNH some FLs won't be available as they will be below the transition altitude.

The USA and Canada adopted the 18000/FL180 transition as it is generally higher than most of the mountainous areas of each country. The notable exceptions being Mt McKinley in Alaska and Mt Logan in the Yukon.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 03:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Arizona Bay
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
consistency?
DA-10mm is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 04:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It used to be FL240 in the western half of the US. I believe it was lowered to join the eastern level of FL180 after the Grand Canyon midair in 1956.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2010, 21:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try the US AIP, or their equivalent.

From memory, they wanted a TA that would work right across the country and 18,000 was lowest altitude that would work. I could be very wrong though...

Some explanations in the AIP, ENR 1.7; http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publi...bs/AIP/aip.pdf

Last edited by Love_joy; 21st Feb 2010 at 21:23.
Love_joy is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 08:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sussex
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some good stuff here

http://www.caa.no/multimedia/archive..._for_6358a.pdf

See also:
Comment: Europe should have a common, higher transition altitude

The CAA might get it one day
Masai is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 08:56
  #16 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they can sort out the issues of which QNHs to use where, and how pilots obtain them, I see no reason why we shouldn't raise it up to 10,000' or higher in Europe.

Doesn't seem to be a mad rush though. The discussions have been kicking around for over 15 years in the UK CAA alone.
10W is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 10:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While we're on the subject, what's the lowest TA/TL? - 3000' for Jersey (EGJJ) as far as I can find.

fc101
fc101 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 10:22
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi fc101,

How about Johannesburg FAJS?

Elevation: 5558ft; Transition Altitude = 8000ft (2,442 feet aal) !!!
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 12:16
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: AMS
Age: 35
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Netherlands;

IFR 3000 ft.
VFR 3500 ft.
Worstebroodje is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2010, 15:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those with long memories will recall that the USA at one time had three levels of airways, low...to 14,000 feet, intermediate 14,000 to 24,000 feet, and jet airways, FL240 and above.
When the change was made for jet airways to be lowered to 18,000 feet, and at the same time (or slightly later) the positive control area (class A airspace) was to be lowered to FL180, both east and west transistion levels were set at...18,000 ft/FL180.
411A is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.