Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Tire burn

Old 10th Nov 2009, 16:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cornwall UK
Age: 80
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tire burn

Every time I see a big/fast aircraft land and see the smoke as the wheels are spun up by contact I wonder if any work has ever been done to see if wheels could be spun up to landing speeds prior to touchdown. Would a set of small fan blades mounted on the sides of each wheel have any effect?
Boslandew is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 17:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Durham
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just adds to the workload the brakes have to do. All transfers into heat..a lot of airlines don't use reverse thrust these days.. they just stamp on the brakes hard..
DERG is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 17:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Convair tried that idea on one of their aircraft (880/990?). Turns out it wasn't worth the weight.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 17:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Durham
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Furthermore: on take off you will have more drag..not good!
DERG is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 18:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,791
Received 112 Likes on 54 Posts
It has been done, and is still done on some aircraft fitted with gravel landing kits. You can see the nose-wheel spin-up gear on this citation:

Photos: Cessna 550 Citation II Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
Checkboard is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 20:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Near sheep!
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has been discussed before.

The initial cost of the equipment, the space it occupy's, the fuel used carrying it, and the maintenance cost's towards running it......by far outway's the cost of the tread loss off the re-moulds!!

Although, with intense flying programmes surrounding e.g ryanair's 738's...maybe something like that would be viable.

Boffins...??
WindSheer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2009, 21:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,489
Received 148 Likes on 82 Posts
Why not have a runway which is like a huge conveyor belt...............
TURIN is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 00:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not have a runway which is like a huge conveyor belt...............
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Delete this thread before it starts!!!!!
SMOC is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 04:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Between East and West Poles.
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in the mist of times in the 1950`s the company that I worked for had Lockheed L749 aircraft. On the outboard side of the nose wheel tyres were flaps that opened into the airstream to rotate the wheel before landing. However never saw a tyre as such as they were fitted with the flaps cut off. No idea of the reason why the flaps were removed.
Runaround Valve is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 15:03
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cornwall UK
Age: 80
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tire burn

Many thanks for the comments. I guess that if tire burn was a big enough or expensive enough problem, something would have been done about it and it obviously isn't.
Boslandew is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 15:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
Age: 79
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tire burn......

I once had a senior Boeing engineer sitting in the cockpit on a flight to Seattle from Copenhagen (before 9/11). He had a fantastic knowledge of aviation, and he had an answer to the question in this thread.
He said that the main reason for not having such a system installed is, that the rotational speed of the wheels MUST match the actual ground speed closely in order to get any significant decrease in tire burn. This close match is very difficult to achieve for several reasons, so combined with the other negative factors (weight, costs etc...) makes an "anti tire burn" system a non starter.
grebllaw123d is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 19:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: KwaZulu Natal
Age: 65
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just adds to the workload the brakes have to do.

JSP
Juliet Sierra Papa is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 21:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JSP - I'm guessing that DERG is referring to the small amount of kinetic energy taken out of the landing aircraft when the wheels spin up (spin up wheels requires a force which comes from the velocity of the a/c), though I would think that it is less than a knot....

...Probably wrong tho'
Cough is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2009, 22:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd never seen grebllaw123d's answer before, but it makes so much sense, that it settles the question for me.

CJ
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 09:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Durham
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Cough I am. Every time I fly as a passenger on short haul jets these days I note the hard and short braking done on landing. The conclusion I came too: brake maintenance is cheaper than jet fuel and engine maintenance.

There are always jobs advertised for guys who maintain the brakes so I would guess the life of the brake components is short.
DERG is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 10:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,652
Received 68 Likes on 43 Posts
Check,are you sure that`s a spin-up device and not a brake on the nosewheel?
sycamore is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2009, 22:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Wheel spin up energy loss

Cough - I've used this as a first-year physics example.

Spinning up the wheels should soak up about 0.6% of the kinetic energy when landing a 747 at M = 300 tons. This is equivalent to 0.3% of the speed, so less than a knot is right.

I assumed a moment of inertia of about I = 45 Kg-square-meter for a 747 tire, a mass of M_W = 200 Kg (guess) and a radius of R_W = 66cm.

The 0.6% number should be almost independent of R_W, but scales with the mass ratio M_W/M, and the moment of inertia to mass-radius-squared scaling value of I/(M_W * R_W * R_W), which I took to be 0.5. It's independent of landing speed. Landing light soaks up more of the total energy to spin the wheels.
awblain is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2009, 11:11
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LegoLand
Age: 70
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minor tread drift

to DERG

A least one of the small regional jets - the BeA-146 - don't have trust reversers AFAIK..
fhegner is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2009, 11:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Durham
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Hiya fhegner

Thanks for that advice..that is my fave aircraft to ride in too!
DERG is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.