Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Intake Screens on Jet Engines ?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Intake Screens on Jet Engines ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th September 2009 | 02:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: The 'Bat Cave' @ HLP in the Big Durian Indo
Intake Screens on Jet Engines ?

With the frequent damage and danger to turbofan and jet engines from items like FOD and bird injestion I wonder what technical issues preclude the use of a wide opening wire mesh intake screen ?

Is the effect on intake efficiency that dramatic that it's not practical or is there some other reason that precludes a cleverly engineered solution ?
aseanaero is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 03:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
For a start, deicing the wire mesh would be a tricky issue. And it would also affect the airflow into the engine thereby impacting the efficiency. And what do you do when a couple of birds gets stuck on the wire mesh ????
leewan is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 03:09
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
1) Drag.

2) Thrust reduction.

3) Longevity.

4) When they break, they become FOD, too...
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 11:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Canada
The simple reason is that the impact force increases as the square of speed. Start doing the math of even a 2.5 lb bird hitting a surface at 250 knots and the force is high enough that building any sort of effective screen acnnot be practically done.

Take a look at bird strike damage pictures at even low speed and you will see that even airframe structures are not immune to damage.

This is a great theoretical idea that surfaces regularly, but is currently an engineering impossibility.
Canuckbirdstrike is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 11:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: The 'Bat Cave' @ HLP in the Big Durian Indo
In 2050 an intake laser matrix to chop the bird up into engine digestable bits
aseanaero is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 13:57
  #6 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1
From: Hampshire, UK
Well one day they will simply install automatic phasers to zap FOD from getting into the intake. They work very well because we have all seen in Star Trek, things go all silhouettey and then disappear completely, possibly just giving an instantaneous view of the skeleton before vanishing. Quick, clean and safe, they are undoubtedly the best solution. But until they are invented, we are going to constantly get this daft chestnut forever resurrected by people who don't know about trying Search.

In case people think Star Trek thingummies are daft, tell me in what way my iPhone differs from a Tricorder? (apart from not giving you a complete medical with a 'tweeting' sound). We laughed at them then, but they are here.
Rainboe is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 14:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: wales
If phasers exist, then so do warp-drives. Problem solved!
jefferybond is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 14:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: USA
Intake screens have been used on some turbojet equipment. Intake screens are commonly used on some turbopropeller equipment, too.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 14:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: in the shed
older generation engines such as the p&w jt3 had the no1 bearing in the inlet casing so a bird stands a good chanch of being reduced to a mush before it hit the fan,
later engines with big fan technology like cfm56 etc no1 bearing is behind the fan so no protection
best thing to do is keep your aircraft with big fan motors out of africa.
good spark is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 15:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Cool

In case people think Star Trek thingummies are daft, tell me in what way my iPhone differs from a Tricorder? (apart from not giving you a complete medical with a 'tweeting' sound). We laughed at them then, but they are here.
indeed. With a little bit of practice, you can use your IPHONE to have your prostate checked! Go ahead, try it! (you know you want to!)
cessnapuppy is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 15:24
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: _
In 2050 an intake l@ser matrix to chop the bird up into engine digestable bits
The way some cost cutting measures are leaning there'll be no wastage there, chopped bird will be tapped off at the HPC and on the crew menu in no time!
Port Strobe is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 16:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: 3433N 06912E
Rainboe... a Trekkie !! who would've thunk it !!
Bruce Wayne is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 17:08
  #13 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1
From: Hampshire, UK
Go on- I got a feeling I will regret this....but....I will lay my head on the block....how do I check my prostate with an iphone? Is there an app for it? Did you know it even has an app to measure windspeed? I love it.

They got to forget that Transporter thing, or we are all stuffed in this industry!
Rainboe is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 20:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Go on- I got a feeling I will regret this....but....I will lay my head on the block....how do I check my prostate with an iphone? Is there an app for it? .....
First, you have to bend way over
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 21:16
  #15 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1
From: Hampshire, UK
Before you go any futher, I don't think I can reach! I think I maybe a little out of tune with the world in not wanting to take that any further! I thought there maybe an iProstate app for 59 pence- it would not surprise me in the least.
Rainboe is offline  
Reply
Old 11th September 2009 | 21:48
  #16 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,183
Likes: 1,119
From: UK
Is there an app for checking your sight. The iEye?
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2009 | 01:03
  #17 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: USA
One strike and you would not just be shredding bird but damaging metal not to mention creating less airflow into the inlet that contributes to many other turbine engine problems. The current designs are better at tossing the chickens into the bypass flow, less and larger blades to damage on the fan. Trust them, they have a good handle on it.
muduckace is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2009 | 02:23
  #18 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 37
From: Australia
"Is there an app for checking your sight. The iEye?"

Yes, one especially for Star Trek captains.. .the "iEye Captain".

The engines canna' take any more FOD, captain...
NSEU is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2009 | 03:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: southampton
I seem to remember a Westland Wyvern from HMS Eagle (813 Sqdn), fitted with intake guards, went down in a Norwegian Fjord around about 1957 time. The most likely cause was thought to be engine failure due to the intake icing over. Anyone with any history on this incident?
Mech one is offline  
Reply
Old 15th September 2009 | 01:58
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Lots of helos use separator devices, variously called EAPS (engine air particle separator) or IPS (inertial particle separator) to remove sand, dust etc. from inlet air. It's a bit of a drag on engine performance, but pays off by reducing compressor erosion for longer service life.

Depending on the dimensions of the device, it may be effective on birds, but could be a real hazard in ice.

The H-53's deployed on the Iranian hostage rescue mission (1979) used EAPS, which was probably a mistake because they reduced engine output (and thus helo lift capacity); When you're on a life-or-death mission, you really don't care if the engine lasts an extra 2000 hrs.
barit1 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.