Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Intake Screens on Jet Engines ?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Intake Screens on Jet Engines ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th September 2009 | 16:31
  #21 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: USA
I wonder if a device similar to a blender protruding out of the nose cone to chop/dice and deflect out to the bypass area would be effective w/o disturbing airflow.
muduckace is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2012 | 20:11
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: New York
Wire Mesh Problems and Solutions

First and foremost, which size wire mesh would you be looking at? Are you talking about something fine, like lets say 80 x 80 mesh? Or something with more of a wide opening like a 4 x 4 wire mesh? (Difference can be found here: Custom Wire Cloth - Belleville Wire Cloth Co - Cedar Grove, NJ )

The fine wire mesh would probably restrict air flow too much. This would cut down on air flow almost near the 50% range and for obvious reason that will not work. The larger wire mesh with bigger openings presents different problems, the main one being a bird sticking to the mesh and staying there for an entire flight. I don't see this working, but there may possibly be a way to angle the mesh and get this done?
Jackcon is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2012 | 01:39
  #23 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
I have read of an early axial-flow engine (J47) with retractable inlet screen segments - used during TO & low-altitude ops. They retracted outward into the inlet case when not needed.

Not sure how successful they were.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2012 | 02:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: .
Anyone remember the early MiG 29 and its louvres? Or the later variants with mesh screens, much like the SU 27?
blah blah blah is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2012 | 17:48
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 780
Likes: 89
From: Seattle
blah

I was just thinking about the MiG system as I scrolled by your post. Good for FOD prevention on takeoff and landing from substandard runways. But its a performance penalty (weight and complexity) that the military is willing to accept. Not so for commercial.

As others have stated, this may work well at low speeds (takeoff and landing) with runway debris. But bird strikes at higher speed will need too much structural strength. Better to clean the runway and shoot and eat the birds.
EEngr is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.