Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Coffin Corner


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Coffin Corner

Old 7th June 2009 | 19:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Coffin Corner

I have read with great interest the posts concerning the diminishing range of allowable speeds for a heavy airliner at higher altitudes, ie between stalling and overspeed. Is there any significant difference between say, the A 330-200 and the B767-300, in their allowable speed range at similar heavy weight and high altitude?
Niallo is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2009 | 14:56
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Canada
As of now, 377 viewers of this question but zero replies!
Is this because:
It was a dumb question?
The question was badly written?
To provide an answer would be too time consuming?
There is no clear answer?
Neil
Niallo is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2009 | 15:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
There have been no replies because each aircraft is uniquely different to another. To take the point even further, the same aircraft type at differing weights exhibits entirely different characteristics as the weight varies.

Apples and Pears, Chalk and Cheese...................

Regards,

Old Smokey

Last edited by Old Smokey; 10th June 2009 at 04:13. Reason: Can't spell for nuts
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2009 | 19:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: manchester
Pears, Old Smokey. Pears
al446 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2009 | 01:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Prof. Airport Engineer
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Australia (mostly)
So this thread is not left hanging, with the scepter of the coffin corner unanswered, ELAC in R&N here said the following for the A330-200:
At FL350 and 210 tons my A330-200 (slightly different engines) would have had a barberpole at M.86 of 292 KIAS and a Vls 1.3G of 241 KIAS, a spread of 51 kts. A M.80 cruise would have been at 272 KIAS and the recommended TAPS would have been 260 KIAS. At either speed there would exist an approx. 20 KIAS margin to the nearest limiting speed, let alone the nearest actual buffet speed. That's a pretty wide margin to operate within and hardly anything like a coffin corner.
I don't have the same data for the 767-300.
OverRun is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2009 | 02:30
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 647
Likes: 19
From: East side of OZ
Max AUW of a B767-300 is 185 tonnes so there can be no viable comparison with these Airbus figures.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2009 | 04:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Thank you al446, I stand corrected

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2009 | 14:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
I have just been looking at Buffet Onset Boundary charts for three different jets and, whilst they all look the same, they are not when you put some examples in.

Things such as wing section, % MAC of C of G, weight etc. all come into play. Thus the range between low and high speed stall will vary from aircraft to aircraft.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.