Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Sense of Propellor rotation

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Sense of Propellor rotation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th May 2009, 20:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The New Forest, UK
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sense of Propellor rotation

Other than in engines with counter rotating propellors, is there a technical or historical reason for choosing an anticlockwise propellor rotation?
(when regarded from the front) I presume this is universal in western piston and turboprop designs.
b377 is offline  
Old 26th May 2009, 21:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While clockwise (viewed from rear) is predominant, there are still plenty of exceptions even today. There's no hard technical reason, but since a prop needs to be fitted, it's an advantage to make the engine turn the same direction as available props.
barit1 is offline  
Old 26th May 2009, 22:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With non-geared engines, subject to the engine manufacturer. Us built engines rotate clockwise where UK built engines rotate counterclockwise… even the jet engines GE and Pratts rotate clockwise whilst the RR counterclockwise.
captjns is offline  
Old 26th May 2009, 22:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by b377
... I presume this is universal in western piston and turboprop designs.
Not so ... Clockwise (from the rear) is only "normal" for American engines, whereas British piston engines rotate in the counter-clockwise (from the rear) direction.

That, of course, begs another question ...


JD



sorry, captjns, I inadvertently duplicated your post ...
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 08:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Once a Squirrel Heaven (or hell!), Shropshire UK
Posts: 837
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
The answer:

Contra-rotating!
Shackman is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 09:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey what happens if you are south of the equator!?!?!
captjns is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 09:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Hey what happens if you are south of the equator!?!?!
You disappear straight down the plughole hanging on to a bootful of left rudder!
brakedwell is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 13:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The answer:

Contra-rotating!
At least one new engine, the GEnx, is contrarotating. Core turns cw, fan ccw (anti-clockwise in the UK).
barit1 is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 13:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops... forgot about the Piper (PA-34) Senca. It has continental counter rotating engines. and the PA-31-325, the Piper Navajo CR has Lycoming counter rotating engines.
captjns is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 13:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chiang Mai, Thailand
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course England is counter rotating. Same on the road and with the money.
dutch crosswind is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 14:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,143
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I believe that low-power British engines (gipsy major, etc) traditionally rotate anti-clockwise (when viewed from behind) to make them easier for a right-handed chap (or chapess) to swing them.

When standing in front, ones right arm naturally swings clockwise.

Eck
eckhard is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 21:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prop swinging.

When standing in front, ones right arm naturally swings clockwise.
I'm sure someone who has done it will correct me, but if you swing clockwise right handed, is there not a danger that your body naturally leans toward the prop? I'm sure I've seen props swung 'on the backhand', so to speak, so you naturally walk away from the disk with the 'swinging hand' behind you.

Roger.
Landroger is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 21:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet engine rotation.

With non-geared engines, subject to the engine manufacturer. Us built engines rotate clockwise where UK built engines rotate counterclockwise… even the jet engines GE and Pratts rotate clockwise whilst the RR counterclockwise.
Do they? That is an interesting and intriguing fact, to be sure, which prompts me to ask; There is quite a lot of rotating mass inside a high bypass fan jet so, would a GE powered aeroplane - say a 757 - turn slightly differently from an R-R powered 757?

Roger.
Landroger is offline  
Old 27th May 2009, 22:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
US vs UK

In theory, yes, due to gyroscopic loads the rotors place on the engine structure and thus into the mountings.

But the gyro loads are quite insignificant compared to the control forces the pilot employs during normal maneuvers, and I doubt anyone ever notices.

PS - the engines available for the 757 are R-R and P&W, not GE.
barit1 is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 20:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: France
Age: 69
Posts: 1,143
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Landroger,

Back in the '70s I did start Chipmunks, Stampes and Tigers a few times by prop-swinging. I found the position that the prop stopped in (2 o'clock) made it easy to use my right arm, but I see what you mean about the 'backhanded swing'. I must say I was always very careful (and a little scared). There was a horror story doing the rounds then about a poor guy who walked towards the entry door of an Aero Commander with the engines running and got minced by the prop. They found one of his hands on the hangar roof.

The trickiest part was taking a passenger for a flight and having to brief them on the operation of the cockpit controls. Always made sure we had chocks installed and brakes on for that exercise!
eckhard is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 23:12
  #16 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop

Of course just to complicate matters the Rolls Royce Trent 900 and 1000 has spools that contra rotate!
gas path is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 23:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,049
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Griffon rotates the opposite way to the Merlin.

As to the man walking into the prop of the Aero Commander, on the C152 the wing strut would tend to prevent that a bit, but the new 162 sadly has the strut behind the door, which in my eyes is an accident in the making.

AS for some of the Gas Turbs, well a lot of them go both ways, as in the HP/ LP compressor rotations to counteract the rotational forces.

Damn u beat me to it as I typed !!
NutLoose is online now  
Old 29th May 2009, 02:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before all the modern c/r ships -

The fighter pilot's lament:

"Don't give me a P-38
with propellers that counter-rotate;
she loop and she'l spin
and she'll soon auger in -
Don't give me a P-38!"
barit1 is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 06:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
The Rolls Royce (Bristol) Pegasus engine in the Harrier uses counter rotating shafts to reduce the gyroscopic effect on the low speed handling of the aircraft.
dixi188 is online now  
Old 29th May 2009, 17:40
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the information guys - fascinating stuff. As for contra rotating spools in modern engines, you can sort of see why from the gas flow/reaction point of view, but any bearing between two spools will naturally have elements running at twice the speed of a fixed outer/moving inner arrangement and several times that of spools rotating in the same orientation. In that case I imagine one spool would be running at a percentage of the other and thus the relative speeds are quite small.

Roger.
Landroger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.