A320: Approach Checklist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: kuwait
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A320: Approach Checklist
Hello,
i would like to know when do you ask for the approach checklist.
some airlines do it at TOD and others at 10.000ft and also some of them at the trans.level .
all inputs are appreciated.
i would like to know when do you ask for the approach checklist.
some airlines do it at TOD and others at 10.000ft and also some of them at the trans.level .
all inputs are appreciated.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Again....Read the Book...
First, read carefully your company's SOP. This is what you must go by.
Airbus has a very nice publication on how to run a normal checklist. This
will give you background as to why your company does what it does.
"FLIGHT OPERATIONS BRIEFING NOTES" ..... "NORMAL CHECKLISTS"
A few examples:
1. The normal checklist is NOT a read-n'-do checklist. Thus, it should not
be initiated until all items on that checklist have been accomplished. Normally, there should be no "Hold the checklist at.......(whatever)".
If there is a normal break in flow of a checklist, most companies do an
"Above the Line" and a "Below the Line" protocol.
2. The normal checklist should be run without interruption. Good task management provides for time for both accomplishing the items on the checklist AND for running the checklist.
IF a checklist has to be interrupted, one should state, "Hold the Checklist at.......(whatever)". When the checklist can be continued, "Resume the Checklist (or "Continue the Checklist"....whatever your company specifies) at ..........". In some cases, it may be prudent to start the whole checklist over again....from the beginning. Airbus recommends, at the very least, to back up one item on the checklist when being interrupted and having to hold the checklist.
3. The crewmember reading the checklist and commanding the response should verify that the response coming from the other pilot is correct. In other words, the pilot reading the checklist needs to get his nose out of the checklist to see that the responding pilot's response is correct. VERIFY!
4. The commands and responses need to be EXACTLY as printed. If you cannot do so because of an unusual situation, this should be noted in the response.
5. If an interruption is 'not so important'....continue the checklist until
completed, then attend to the interruption.
6. Normal checkists must not be accomplished from memory. Both the reading pilot AND the responding pilot should have the checklist in front of them....referring to it....challenge AND response.
A proper normal checklist is not so detailed that the pilots get bogged down in minutia, but detailed enough to cover the important items (the "Killer Items"). (This applies to briefings, as well!)
Fly safe,
PantLoad
Airbus has a very nice publication on how to run a normal checklist. This
will give you background as to why your company does what it does.
"FLIGHT OPERATIONS BRIEFING NOTES" ..... "NORMAL CHECKLISTS"
A few examples:
1. The normal checklist is NOT a read-n'-do checklist. Thus, it should not
be initiated until all items on that checklist have been accomplished. Normally, there should be no "Hold the checklist at.......(whatever)".
If there is a normal break in flow of a checklist, most companies do an
"Above the Line" and a "Below the Line" protocol.
2. The normal checklist should be run without interruption. Good task management provides for time for both accomplishing the items on the checklist AND for running the checklist.
IF a checklist has to be interrupted, one should state, "Hold the Checklist at.......(whatever)". When the checklist can be continued, "Resume the Checklist (or "Continue the Checklist"....whatever your company specifies) at ..........". In some cases, it may be prudent to start the whole checklist over again....from the beginning. Airbus recommends, at the very least, to back up one item on the checklist when being interrupted and having to hold the checklist.
3. The crewmember reading the checklist and commanding the response should verify that the response coming from the other pilot is correct. In other words, the pilot reading the checklist needs to get his nose out of the checklist to see that the responding pilot's response is correct. VERIFY!
4. The commands and responses need to be EXACTLY as printed. If you cannot do so because of an unusual situation, this should be noted in the response.
5. If an interruption is 'not so important'....continue the checklist until
completed, then attend to the interruption.
6. Normal checkists must not be accomplished from memory. Both the reading pilot AND the responding pilot should have the checklist in front of them....referring to it....challenge AND response.
A proper normal checklist is not so detailed that the pilots get bogged down in minutia, but detailed enough to cover the important items (the "Killer Items"). (This applies to briefings, as well!)
Fly safe,
PantLoad
Last edited by PantLoad; 18th Apr 2009 at 06:45.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Now at Home
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
kuwait340
there is no alternative. My company operates the Airbus acc the "Silent Cockpit"
(-God Thanks- this makes flying relaxed, easy and more safe imho.)
We also do not have an after-takeoff/climb checklist.
No Take-off checklist
no landing checklist.
At the last two points we have only the "take-off check" and "landing check" which is that the pilots say loud after having checked and confirmed on the ECAM page that its shown
TAKE OFF - ALL (items) GREEN and LANDING - ALL (items) GREEN
there is no alternative. My company operates the Airbus acc the "Silent Cockpit"
(-God Thanks- this makes flying relaxed, easy and more safe imho.)
We also do not have an after-takeoff/climb checklist.
No Take-off checklist
no landing checklist.
At the last two points we have only the "take-off check" and "landing check" which is that the pilots say loud after having checked and confirmed on the ECAM page that its shown
TAKE OFF - ALL (items) GREEN and LANDING - ALL (items) GREEN
No one cares where I work. There's no rhyme or reason to what items are per the abbreviation vs the full word. I've heard people read "A/THRUST" as "ay thrust" and "auto thrust". Most people would say "Medium" for the brakes and "Normal" for the engine mode selector but no one would bat an eye if the abbreviation were said instead.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
”NORM”
”LOW” or “MED”
with that being said, I believe nobody in his right mind would debrief you on replying “medium” or “norm-al”
What does it say for “ignition”? Is it IGN or ignition? Ours says IGN but no one is saying “iggin” or “eye gee en”.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts