Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Damp/damp/damp


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Damp/damp/damp

Old 18th September 2008 | 18:34
  #1 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
Damp/damp/damp

Can someone please confirm this needs to be reported on the ATIS. I was operating into a UK airfield recently. We had asked London info for the wx with an hour to go....got the ATIS as soon as it was within range ...neither mentioned the runway state.

I have always understood that no mention of runway state means it is dry.Had the aircraft been 10 % heavier we would have been outside the dry max landing weight. I asked approach to confirm the runway was dry...answer was Damp X 3! We diverted.

This runway has a history of being slippery and the C of F on a damp runway could have made the landing very interesting.
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 18th September 2008 | 20:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If the runway was in the UK and at a certified airport and you had not received a NOTAM declaring that it "may be slippery when wet" then you may have diverted for no reason.

The airport has been windy in the past..........

Thunderstorms are a known problem here......

Damp in a number of states has no basis, try AMS. It is just visible staining of the surface.

Was the runway constructed of skid resistant material eg PFC, GMA or BBA?

What is its LDA and, for your mass, what was your LDAr?

What is the name of your Flight Ops Director and does he serve biscuits when he has a "chat" with you?

Good luck!

Sir George Cayley
 
Reply
Old 18th September 2008 | 21:15
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: Location: Location:
Is it not the case that a grooved runway when damp/damp/damp is considered dry for perf purposes.

Bristols runway used to be crap and very slippy
G-SPOTs Lost is offline  
Reply
Old 18th September 2008 | 22:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: london, UK
I dont ever recall being asked to broadcast runway surface conditions on the ATIS other than when snow, ice or freezing fog were current weather conditions. With the UK weather as temperamental as it is, if I had to put "damp/damp/damp" out every time it actually was, then we'd never land or depart anything, cos the griptester would be permanently out on the runway!

BTW, we only broadcast runway surface conditions via ATIS when requested to by the Airport Operator (BAA).
pelagic is offline  
Reply
Old 19th September 2008 | 07:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Someone once told me that damp x 3 means that the R/W is divided into three portions and all the three are damp. However, I have not been able to get any written info. about it. Can anyone quote authority? I have heard this on ATIS at Manchester England.
sharpshooter41 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th September 2008 | 07:19
  #6 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 9
From: Switzerland, Singapore
It also depends on your company procedures.

All companies I know consider damp as dry for performance calculation, as long as there is no BC or BA (braking action or coefficient) is given. If ATC doesn't give you one of these two, you can safely assume that the BA is "good" and the BC is above 0.4.

It's something else if ATC tells you BC "unreliable", but mostly this is not because the runway is slippery, but because the BC is not measurable with the equipment given on the airport.

But it's also good to go on the safer side and do the divertion.

hth,
Dani
Dani is offline  
Reply
Old 19th September 2008 | 11:53
  #7 (permalink)  
Buttonpusher
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 4
From: Bloody Hell
Someone once told me that damp x 3 means that the R/W is divided into three portions and all the three are damp. However, I have not been able to get any written info. about it. Can anyone quote authority? I have heard this on ATIS at Manchester England.
I was under this impression too the sections were Touchdown/Mid/Rollout. I hope someone can clarify this. TIA
FLCH is offline  
Reply
Old 19th September 2008 | 15:10
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 838
From: Tring, UK
In my book damp = dry for performance purposes, unless otherwise promulgated...

I did hear the runway being described as "moist" on approach to LGW once, accompanied by much schoolboy sniggering.
FullWings is offline  
Reply
Old 19th September 2008 | 15:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 350
From: UK
Someone once told me that damp x 3 means that the R/W is divided into three portions and all the three are damp. However, I have not been able to get any written info. about it. Can anyone quote authority? I have heard this on ATIS at Manchester England.
See this in the UK AIP, para 15, “Runway Surface Condition Reporting“.
safetypee is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.